dbraverman88
Well-known member
I you want to still be able to boot into OS 9, would the best option be to keep the stock NVIDIA GeForce2 MX?
So unless I'm mistaken, and barring further more detailed research, looks like you get to pick either Core Image or OS 9 support, but not both. On a single card, that is.ATI Mobility Radeon 9600, 9700, or X1600ATI Radeon 9550, 9600, 9650, 9600 XT, 9600 Pro, 9700 Pro, 9800 XT, and 9800 Pro
ATI Radeon X600 XT, X600 Pro, X800 XT, X850 XT, X1600, X1900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra, 6600, 6600 LE, 6800 Ultra DDL, and 6800 GT DDL
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT, 7600 GT, and 7800 GT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Intel GMA 950.
Sorry for the late response, but I just realized that my HDD crash allowed me to give an answer. I have a flashed GeForce 6200, which *does* support CI, and was able to boot to my OS 9.1 CD just fine at 1280x1024. I didn't actually install OS 9, so I'm not sure if you'd get any acceleration, but you *can* get the full range of resolutions out of the card, apparently.So unless I'm mistaken, and barring further more detailed research, looks like you get to pick either Core Image or OS 9 support, but not both. On a single card, that is.
The way the G5 operates, though, it does not need level 3 cache. The PC3200 RAM is fast enough to cover for the lack of level 3, which was why Apple did not include any. It should still run faster than the G4.I ran the test again, and the results remained the same (except for my disk scores - the new HDD I put in after the old one crashed scored a 41.9).
Perhaps the test heavily favors a cache, which the G5 only has 512KB of per processor against my 2MB.
Hmmm...well I have no idea then. If you look at the stock MDD benchmarks, they're all pretty similar to mine, so it's not something specific with the processor upgrade. Also interesting is that xbench erroneously lists the speed of the L3 cache.The way the G5 operates, though, it does not need level 3 cache. The PC3200 RAM is fast enough to cover for the lack of level 3, which was why Apple did not include any. It should still run faster than the G4.
Or replace the 64KB chip with a 128KB one.I had heard there were some problems with flashed cards because the ROM on a PC card is half the size of the one on a Mac card, so you have to use a truncated ROM image when you flash a PC card which cause bootup issues under the classic Mac OS. I can't recall atm whether there were OS X related issues.
Which version of XBench are you using? The baseline scores were re-assessed recently, so comparing scores from different versions gives misleading results.Hmmm...well I have no idea then. If you look at the stock MDD benchmarks, they're all pretty similar to mine, so it's not something specific with the processor upgrade. Also interesting is that xbench erroneously lists the speed of the L3 cache.
I have a flashed PC Radeon 9800 Pro in my Digital Audio. I had to use the 64k reduced ROM but after taping over pins 3 and 11 on the AGP connector it booted straight up (OS X 10.4.10 was on the hard drive that was in it at the time but 10.4.6 installed on the new HDD without a hitch). At first I thought there was something wrong because the display was overbright and kind of washed out so I dug up a DVI->VGA converter and tried that. Same thing. Turned out OS X was using some funky calibration for the monitor. Changing the montior cleared it right up, even on VGA. I have Quartz Extreme, Core Image, all the niceties:I had heard there were some problems with flashed cards because the ROM on a PC card is half the size of the one on a Mac card, so you have to use a truncated ROM image when you flash a PC card which cause bootup issues under the classic Mac OS. I can't recall atm whether there were OS X related issues.
Easier said than done really :/Or replace the 64KB chip with a 128KB one.
Would you be willing to attempt OS 9 on that card and tell us what results you get?I have a flashed PC Radeon 9800 Pro in my Digital Audio