Curious, how could a G4 possibly be slower?
I think a G3 with a higher clock speed can be faster than a G4 with a lower speed for non-AltiVec apps, and his G4 is only something like 400 or 450 MHz in comparison to the 600 MHz iMac.Curious, how could a G4 possibly be slower?
If i may ask, why aren't you going to Lepoard, apart from the cost of it?I have no intention of upgrading to Leopard on these machines, ever. As apps become Leopard-only, i'll stop using them.
Maybe i'll purchase a new machine with Leopard later, but for now just nothing can beat the form factor of the iMac G3. Having some issues sourcing a 600mhz G3 though.
Considering that it sounds like the machine was a "lemon" from the amount of times it went back to Apple under warranty, and the early MacBooks are well-known to be rubbish, it would seem to make sense to sell it (it might get quite a good price) and get a new MacBook (if that's what you want), unless you can find one with a trashed screen for very cheap and are confident in piecing the two together into a working one.you know for the price of that part alone you are better of selling the junked macbook for parts and then start saving for a new 1300 macbook
I don't think I'd trust the machine though, from what you said about how many times things have gone wrong on it before it sounds like one of those ones that was just never right and something else will go wrong on it. One reason why I decided to cut my losses and sell my Acer and get a new PC rather than paying several hundred to get it repaired was that I wouldn't have trusted it again after two things had gone wrong with it in the last 6 months.No, it wouldn't be smart just to save for a new MB because The LoBo is about 300 dollars, and a new MB is $800 more. If I had a job, and a need for a C2D and iLife '08 then I'd get it, however I'd rather just keep this, and save my pennies for a LoBo