Enough taunting in this thread. Leave it out.
Not to stir the hornet's nest, but... does "no taunting" still leave room to attempt to convince to OP in a calm, rational, well-reasoned and non-insulting way that to have simply "found" an item as rare as a working Lisa 1 (with a full set of accessories, no less) lying in a recycling center is a claim of such extraordinary magnitude that any reasonable person would expect evidence to be supplied before believing said claim?
(That it is in fact a claim so fantastic that it essentially insults the intelligence of the readers of this forum to think that they would be so gullible as to believe it without seeing proof, particularly when the technological barrier to supplying said proof is so laughably low that essentially anyone who has access to the Internet should have within their power the means to supply it? I don't believe anyone is asking for anything beyond a few grainy webcam-resolution photographs of a Lisa 1 with something in the background to indicate that the photos were taken for the occasion rather than re-purposed from the results of a Google image search.)
Or is "no taunting" to be taken as the signal that no further discussion on the topic of "proof" is to be permitted and that from this point on anyone reading this thread should simply draw whatever appears to themselves to be the most obvious conclusion regarding the veracity of the claims within this thread, and by extension the veracity of the participants involved?
(I don't really care either way. I'll grant the metaphysical possibility that the OP is being perfectly truthful in his account and is, for instance, simply unaware of just how rare a find a Lisa 1 would be and thus fails to understand why his story sounds so fanciful.)
