mint condition apple iigs woz edition with box
mint condition c64, 1541 disk drive, and 1702 monitor (not mint)
tandy 102, mint
mint condition c64, 1541 disk drive, and 1702 monitor (not mint)
tandy 102, mint
Two fouls! They are both extremely rare rather than being unusual.Prototype Mac SEBoxed Lisa 2
Kensington. I have two. They rock.The old Kingston(?) ADB trackballs for the Mac
Some of the above thanks to members here!Gravis Mac Gamepad.Apple remotes for TV/video cards
ALPS Glidepoint ADB trackpad {x2}
numeric ADB keypad {x2, one with an integrated trackball}
50 pin SCSI DVD drives {x7 in a storage tower}
Radius Rocket 68040/33MHz card
Through The Looking Glass original disk
Daystar adapter to put PowerCache or Turbo040 in a Mac IIcx.
I've had the same brainfart. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't work electrically, as they're both designed for a 16MHz 68030 CPU socket (rather than a PDS socket).Daystar adapter / IIcx. I hope to some day clone this thing so that it will physically fit in an SE/30. It should already be electrically compatible.
Say what? A 5 slot PPC Nubus machine? 8-o Is stealing the controller the only mod required? Apart from I assume installing two Nubus sockets.Power Computing Power 80/100/120 machines--the 8100 clone. These have spots for 5 NuBus slots on the motherboard, but one would need to steal the Fat-AMIC chip from a 9150 to implement the two uninstalled slots.
Well, it's never that simple is it? The regular non-fat AMIC is a 160 pin chip and the FAT-AMIC is a 208 pin chip. If it was a simple chip replacement and socket installation I would have already done it.Say what? A 5 slot PPC Nubus machine? 8-o Is stealing the controller the only mod required? Apart from I assume installing two Nubus sockets.t;]Power Computing Power 80/100/120 machines--the 8100 clone. These have spots for 5 NuBus slots on the motherboard, but one would need to steal the Fat-AMIC chip from a 9150 to implement the two uninstalled slots.
Was the MacSnap "the best" or "the most popular" RAM upgrade for the original compact Macs?Dove MacSnap RAM/SCSI upgrade for the 128K/512K -- there were loads of RAM/SCSI upgrade makers, but this was one of the best.
But getting back to the Dove MacSnap boards, I am most interested in knowing the specific differences between the MacSnap 5.0 "RAM upgrade" (without SCSI, uses the stock 64k ROMs) that was made for the Mac 512k. It came in two flavors: 1MB & 2MB. How other than examining the markings on the RAM ICs can one tell the difference between the 1MB and 2MB boards?I was fond of the Newlife upgrades for the 512KE because RAM was very expensive back then and the Newlife upgrade has eight SIMM sockets.
So, on a Mac 512KE you could get to 4 MB by installing two expensive
(like $80 each) 1 MB SIMMs, and six inexpensive ($5 each or free)
256K SIMMs. That added to the RAM on the motherboard took the
machine to 4 MB.
The Newlife upgrade had its own 68000 CPU on board but it was not any
faster than the Mac CPU. The guys at Newlife explained that it was
just easier to put the Mac CPU to sleep and have their own CPU on
their board than it was to arrange to use the Mac CPU. 68000 chips
were under $10 back then, IIRC.
Newlife also had an upgrade which I could never afford. It installed
in a Plus or 512KE and provided a fast 68030, memory expansion, SCSI
and video out. I really wanted that one. I think it's memory
could go to 16 MB. The Mac ROM didn't support more than 4 MB, but
the way I understood it, the extra memory became a RAM disk, and then
one took advantage of the 68030's PMMU to implement virtual memory
which turned around and used the RAM disk for its scratch space, thus
turning the extra RAM into available RAM in an bass-ackwards kind of
way. One had to have Connectix's "Virtual" to make this work.