Exactly! He even mentioned that he felt like he's been a part of the achievement. Heck, he's the one who suggested the very notion of the SE/30 compatibility of this card. I'd say he was the founding member of the project team, not a mere part of it.Thats awesome. Its people like that, who has a surplus of stuff to sell cheaply, Allows this to happen in the first place.
Why would you do that? Are you determined to break things?ok so i tried this IIsi radius card in the Iici
Why do you keep saying that? Every PDS implementation has had a different pinout. That doesn't make it "not a PDS", when:The IIci Cache Slot is / not a PDS slot per se.
Heck, it's more of a P.D.S. than any of the bridged "LC PDS compatible" slots in the post-030 Performas, which aren't Processor Direct Slots.all the signals for the 030PDS is there
Because it's not, per se. A Cache Slot is more and less than a PDS slot at the same time.Why do you keep saying that? Every PDS implementation has had a different pinout. That doesn't make it "not a PDS", when:The IIci Cache Slot is / not a PDS slot per se.
Heck, it's more of a P.D.S. than any of the bridged "LC PDS compatible" slots in the post-030 Performas, which aren't Processor Direct Slots.all the signals for the 030PDS is there
I saw a mention of it somewhere…Why would you do that? Are you determined to break things?