I have a variety of vintage macs (IIci, IIfx, LC III, Powerbook 3400, Quadra 605, Quadra 700, PowerMac 8600). They all have 10Base-T NICs in them (Quadra 700 and PoweMac 8600 are built-in).
I've noticed that KBps (Bytes not bits) varies wildly between them, with the less powerful machines being the slowest.
For example, the Quadra 605 on my local network gets a MAX of about 42KBps transfer throughput, thats 336kbps on a 10Mbps LAN link - which seems really low. In this case, I'm downloading a file from a more modern iMac on the local network running a web server, the download is being done in Netscape 4.X on the Quadra 605. Is that a reasonable trasnfer throughput? Is the bottleneck the CPU horsepower?
On my PowerMac 8600, I get a much better transfer rate, like 220KBps throughput (1.7Mbps) - better but still far below the max link capacity.
Its more of curiosity, though it is annoying how long it takes to get stuff onto that Quadra 605 when 42KBps is my max speed.
I've noticed that KBps (Bytes not bits) varies wildly between them, with the less powerful machines being the slowest.
For example, the Quadra 605 on my local network gets a MAX of about 42KBps transfer throughput, thats 336kbps on a 10Mbps LAN link - which seems really low. In this case, I'm downloading a file from a more modern iMac on the local network running a web server, the download is being done in Netscape 4.X on the Quadra 605. Is that a reasonable trasnfer throughput? Is the bottleneck the CPU horsepower?
On my PowerMac 8600, I get a much better transfer rate, like 220KBps throughput (1.7Mbps) - better but still far below the max link capacity.
Its more of curiosity, though it is annoying how long it takes to get stuff onto that Quadra 605 when 42KBps is my max speed.
Last edited by a moderator: