Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Found a very unspecific listing on gumtree for a late 2009 macbook with no photo, I decided to go for it, after the seller said it was 2.4ghz, 2gb ram and white, I believed the only possible macbook it could be was a mid 2010. I was right and all my parts to fix its battery and trackpad were from a late 2009, but they were compatible. It now runs sierra and is pretty fast. It has a 256mb geforce 320m. Doesnt look the nicest but is quite ok, especially for $50, thats $37.90 USD and it came with a dodgy looking but working charger. My plans are to glue the cracks, get a new trackpad that works 100% and upgrade the ram.

20171129_202212.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/30/2017 at 5:28 PM, olePigeon said:

Samsung 750 EVO works well if you're looking for an SSD.

Right now you're better off with the 850 EVO. Slightly higher generation and specification, and at most places it's the same price for an 850 as it is for an 750. Heck, last I checked the 750's on the rise more than the 850 is, probably due to dwindling stock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a bit moot now, but this machine only supports 3 gigabit SATA. Was there an issue with some SSDs dropping down to 1.5 gigabit SATA? If so, it probably still felt faster than the original spinning hard disk anyway, but depending on what you're doing (multimedia work, mainly, but also swap with low RAM situations) that additional performance is important.

 

The 850 isn't newer than the 750, the difference between them (they are both of the same "generation") is that the 750 is a lower ("budget") grade drive.

 

960 is the higher grade (PCIe NVME) drive, and is a generation newer than both the 850 and the 750.

 

They're all good SSDs, if the price is the same, I'd probably pick an 850 over a 750, but the benefits of an 850 over a 750 will almost certainly not show unless you have a more modern computer with a faster 6-gigabit SATA connection.

 

Ultimately, what I do with older machines I want SSDs for is go to my local office supply chain or big box electronics retailer and pick up whatever reasonable capacity I can find that's cheapest. I don't think (on a system this old) you'd notice the difference between any of these Samsung drives and a less expensive one from WD/Sandisk. I'm using a Sandisk 240 gig disk in my Mac mini (which has 6-gigabit SATA) and it's fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Cory5412 said:

They're all good SSDs, if the price is the same, I'd probably pick an 850 over a 750, but the benefits of an 850 over a 750 will almost certainly not show unless you have a more modern computer with a faster 6-gigabit SATA connection.

Just checked, the average price of a 250GB 750 EVO is $200. The average price of a 250GB 850 EVO is $90. I think it's safe to say that buying a 750 over an 850 now is a waste of money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...