LC475 with no video

I also had bad experiences on those old boards with pads being prone to lift very easily.
I wonder if it be caused by exposing the pads to too much heat.
What maximum temperature do you advise ?
 
when i suspected cap goo breaking connections I started reflowing pins - this chip was the first

i may have reflowed it twice ( maybe i missed one mentality )

allot of cap goo plus 2 bouts of heat did not fare out well

saying that i have had to reflow pins/pads on other boards several times without pads lifting

i put it down to sustained heat on a small pad is bad ........... sustained heat on a pad that has been 'electrolighted' is very very bad........

to them blast the whole area with a heat gun ................ ah well

----------------

there is basically zero clearance under these ram chips to run jumper wires under them , unless i start bending the pins to create more clearence
dont really want to go there


thats why im thinking of of using sticky copper tape - top left 3 pads missing , im thinking - prep the vias ( tiny sharp pin , dig out the via , file sharp point on soledring iron , flux / solder iron get good via contact - lay copper tape over the 3 missing pads and cover top half of vias - with sharp scalpal knife cut away the copper inbetween to create 3 new pads and traces - finish by soldering copper trace to via )

has anyone had any success with this method

i know i could just start running jumper wires from all over the place , including the back of the board but it be fugly


at least there are several pads that still look good , that will hold the chip solid , so the new connections wont be load bearing

imagine ...... it still gives a good chime !! , and not with just the chip removed , but the 2 caps as well !!!
 
there is basically zero clearance under these ram chips to run jumper wires under them , unless i start bending the pins to create more clearence
dont really want to go there
SMD packages don't sit completely flush to the board. If you use #32 bare wire there should be plenty of clearance.
 
SMD packages don't sit completely flush to the board. If you use #32 bare wire there should be plenty of clearance.
i was looking at a small transformer off some board i have in a drawer - the wire thats wound onto that is very fine .... and the would be insulated as well - that would be a much easier way to go shircsh

wont be going at it for a few days - have to change a blown head gasket on my car tomorrow - cant wait !!!
 
Regarding the onboard RAM, is this possible to disable it entirely, so that only the SIMM is used ?

Edit: this seems possible but requires a ROM modification
 
ive no idea - but its a great idea - ............in rom , yes i guess........... wouldnt it be great if the desigeners included a jumper to bypass the onboard ram

i wonder if there is a way to do it , to trick the rom .......... to not have to replace roms ........... some simple way to report 'onboard ram not present , but keep going ROM"

that might just reserect many lc475's
 
Regarding the onboard RAM, is this possible to disable it entirely, so that only the SIMM is used ?
Just leave it off, don't need to do anything fancy. Desolder it.

The ROM hacks are for disabling it without removing it.

I have the onboard RAM removed from a couple of my machines. A 610 and a 650. Both which basically use a closely related Memory Controller.
 
Got my car done , finally getting back to this poor LC

I need some help folks - cant read schematics .... not a clue

trying to understand them

looking at U5 on this schematic i dont understand what " DADDR[0] 9 A0 " means - what bloody pin is this on the chip

dont the pin counts start at 1 , going anti clockwise , so the "A0" part is not the pin number ( im guessing A0 to A9 is a data bus .... a 10 bit data bus ? ) ....... i hav no idea how to read these

I was thinking the '9' before it could be a pin number on the chip , but then as you go down the values on the left side I see the numbers 22 , 23 ........ how can they be pin numbers on a 20 pin chip


for the love of god , someone please tell me which number from " DADDR[0] 9 A0 " refers to the actual pin on the chip

i notice there are 20 lines coming from the chip in the schematic so if i take them as "DADDR[0] 9 A0" being pin 1 then pin 20 would be the 'line' coming from the top of the graphic ........ going on this i thought pins 13 and 15 were going to ground ( as i see the ground symbol) , but they dont appear to be ......... pin 20 ( the one from the top of the graphic) is the ground........... ?????

using simple continuity tests from U7 to its neighbouring ram chips i start to see the many pins are connected to the same pins on each ram chip - i guess this is the data bus the schematic shows ( A0 to A9) ...........until you get to U11....... i see many traces broken on U11 as well as U5

so the electrolite got up as far as the second ram chip from the caps and broke some traces on that chip as well

if i ever get this board working ........... it aint gonna be pretty with the amount of jumper wires i will have to run










Screenshot from 2026-05-01 18-36-34.png




does anyone have a picture of an LC475 board with the ram chips removed...i just need to see the traces
 
Back
Top