jmacz journey

Faster compiles and IDE performance (I find running CodeWarrior on a 1280x1024 display on any of my 040s still exhibits lag in the editor window). Cross compiles are a bit nicer too. So yeah, need at least one PowerPC based machine. I could of course do development on a modern system with retro68 but I'm choosing to stay in System 7.6.1 :)
 
A Power Mac 8500 with a 500Mhz G3, enough RAM and a fast enough drive is a killer video capture and editing machine under System 7! It can easily digitize SD videos at full size and full frame rate. I would keep!
 
I have been trying to reduce my collection and sold a few of them recently. But having issues reducing further. For the following 11 machines, if you could only keep 5 of them, which would you let go?
  1. Macintosh SE - full memory, has a working miniscribe hard disk
  2. Macintosh SE/30 - full memory, 47MHz 030 Booster and color LCD kit from ZZJ, internal magneto optical drive, Bolle's combo card for ethernet
  3. Macintosh IIci - full memory, has a daystar 50MHz 030 accelerator, ethernet card, many supermac video cards to choose from
  4. Macintosh IIfx - full memory, ZZJ's NuCF compact flash drive, 8 * 24 GC, ethernet, another 8 * 24
  5. Macintosh Quadra 700 - full memory, running at 50MHz with Bolle's quad doubler
  6. Macintosh Quadra 800 - full memory, overclocked to 40MHz
  7. PowerBook 540c - full memory, overclocked to 40MHz, has a full 68040 processor (ie. FPU), working batteries
  8. PowerBook Duo 280c - full memory, has a full 68040 processor (ie. FPU), working batteries
  9. Power Macintosh 8500 - 1GB of memory, 500MHz Newertech processor card upgrade
  10. Macintosh Quadra 950 - full memory, having issues with the SCSI subsystem right now though.. needs to be fixed
  11. Macintosh 512K - stock
I don't think I can cut anything...

I vote to keep the 540c, Duo 280, IIfx, PM8500, SE/30
 
Scary how our two collections look pretty much the same minus the se and duo (and an 8*24 which i realllly want to get from you l, but I've been good) Have you given yourself any criteria for thinning the herd? That usually helps me decide. Do I use it? Can I find another one as nice if I regret the sale,? How much work did I put into in restoring it? Will I need it to help test certain things?
 
I vote to keep the 540c, Duo 280, IIfx, PM8500, SE/30
I would say the same!

If there could be 6, I would keep the SE because a 68000 can read some very early software that no later CPU can read.
if there could be 7, I would keep the Quadra 700 because 68040 @50Mhz! And I love its small tower form factor.

Such a great collection you have anyway. They are all amazing machines!
 
Scary how our two collections look pretty much the same minus the se and duo (and an 8*24 which i realllly want to get from you l, but I've been good) Have you given yourself any criteria for thinning the herd? That usually helps me decide. Do I use it? Can I find another one as nice if I regret the sale,? How much work did I put into in restoring it? Will I need it to help test certain things?

Haha that’s cool! Do I use it is probably what I ask the most. Effort restoring not so much. I enjoy the restoration so always wanting to add more to fix it and sell it off again. I collect, then get frustrated with how much room it’s all taking, then sell. Then repeat. 😂

If there could be 6, I would keep the SE because a 68000 can read some very early software that no later CPU can read.
if there could be 7, I would keep the Quadra 700 because 68040 @50Mhz! And I love its small tower form factor.

Such a great collection you have anyway. They are all amazing machines!

Thanks! I keep starting at keep five and working my way to keep 16. Haha. But I got down to 11 again! It’s a start!
 
Maybe combine the 700 and 800, by taking a dead IIcx and a Q650 board. Have the Q700 form factor with three Nubus slots, 72 pin SIMMs, then, instead of a 40 MHz overclock, the 50MHz Quad Doubler, but maybe running at 66.
 
My “keep” list would be: SE/30, IIfx, Quadra 700, 8500, Quadra 950/512k

Reasons: stock SE rather boring, IIci is ugly, 8500 has same form factor as 800, pre-PPC PowerBooks not terribly useful or fun, the 950 and 512k I could give or take depending on the day. I’d probably lean towards the 950.

Probably because I’ve owned several 512ks and no 950s.
 
Last edited:
I have been trying to reduce my collection and sold a few of them recently. But having issues reducing further. For the following 11 machines, if you could only keep 5 of them, which would you let go?
  1. Macintosh SE - full memory, has a working miniscribe hard disk
  2. Macintosh SE/30 - full memory, 47MHz 030 Booster and color LCD kit from ZZJ, internal magneto optical drive, Bolle's combo card for ethernet
  3. Macintosh IIci - full memory, has a daystar 50MHz 030 accelerator, ethernet card, many supermac video cards to choose from
  4. Macintosh IIfx - full memory, ZZJ's NuCF compact flash drive, 8 * 24 GC, ethernet, another 8 * 24
  5. Macintosh Quadra 700 - full memory, running at 50MHz with Bolle's quad doubler
  6. Macintosh Quadra 800 - full memory, overclocked to 40MHz
  7. PowerBook 540c - full memory, overclocked to 40MHz, has a full 68040 processor (ie. FPU), working batteries
  8. PowerBook Duo 280c - full memory, has a full 68040 processor (ie. FPU), working batteries
  9. Power Macintosh 8500 - 1GB of memory, 500MHz Newertech processor card upgrade
  10. Macintosh Quadra 950 - full memory, having issues with the SCSI subsystem right now though.. needs to be fixed
  11. Macintosh 512K - stock
I don't think I can cut anything...

I feel your struggle. As someone who has acquired, divested, repeated...
  1. List the "personal" machines with an emotional attachment. Perhaps the emotion is about aesthetics. It could be nostalgia or even something that you pined for in decades past that you couldn't get then but own now. This is the most important category because owning these objects can bring happiness, satisfaction, and you're far more likely to use these, further justifying ownership and the related caveats.
  2. List based on practicality and usefulness.
Any machines that are on both lists are definitely keepers.
 
Back
Top