Schmoburger
Well-known member
OK, so I am currently in the process of throwing together a website to be a kind of central resource for unsupported and vintage Mac's, primarily the latter. It is going to, among other things, contain the old support site directories and files as something of another mirror, such that people may access them easily. This is only part of it, as there will be pages with other applicable links, info, articles, etc eventually down the track. In this respect, nothing special.
However part of my objective is to make this page viewable by basically almost any old machine that has an internet connection and some kind of graphical browser. As such I am going in a very very lo-fi and barebones direction... black text all in a universal font, strictly HTML, text hyperlinks, no animations, minimal and small images in basic, early universal formats such as GIF... basically the plan is only to use content that is thin enough and in a format that it is going to almost universally compatible with any browser and hardware that people would have reason to browse it on. You could say it is well and truely function, with form basically not a concern.
My question to the people who would actually use any of this site in this way is, what is the oldest machine, oldest browser, and slowest net connection you are likely to browse this site on if you were to make use of it. I am pretty much trying to gauge exactly how much room I have to play with aesthetics, ie. use of images etc, without alienating or making anybody's ecperience painful in the process... Realistically I am happy to leave the page completely devoid of images and in black on white text if it makes peoples lives easier, but if I can get away with a bit more tart, so be it!
Cheers.
Kieran
However part of my objective is to make this page viewable by basically almost any old machine that has an internet connection and some kind of graphical browser. As such I am going in a very very lo-fi and barebones direction... black text all in a universal font, strictly HTML, text hyperlinks, no animations, minimal and small images in basic, early universal formats such as GIF... basically the plan is only to use content that is thin enough and in a format that it is going to almost universally compatible with any browser and hardware that people would have reason to browse it on. You could say it is well and truely function, with form basically not a concern.
My question to the people who would actually use any of this site in this way is, what is the oldest machine, oldest browser, and slowest net connection you are likely to browse this site on if you were to make use of it. I am pretty much trying to gauge exactly how much room I have to play with aesthetics, ie. use of images etc, without alienating or making anybody's ecperience painful in the process... Realistically I am happy to leave the page completely devoid of images and in black on white text if it makes peoples lives easier, but if I can get away with a bit more tart, so be it!
Cheers.
Kieran