• Updated 2023-07-12: Hello, Guest! Welcome back, and be sure to check out this follow-up post about our outage a week or so ago.

StyleWriter 2200-LocalTalk cable?

classic

Well-known member
I've got a StyleWriter 2200 that I want to hook up to my Powerbook 3400c.

Reading through the StyleWriter 2200 manual it states not to use a "regular" LocalTalk cable.

A regular one is all I have. It fits perfectly into the printer. Should I risk using it?

Ta for any advice.

 

LCGuy

LC Doctor/Hot Rodder
LocalTalk cable, or serial cable? It needs to be a proper serial cable, with all 8 pins. I remember many years ago I tried connecting my StyleWriter II to a Mac via PhoneNET connectors...no can do - it needs a proper serial cable with all 8 pins. I can't see how trying it would harm anything, but at the same time......it won't work, either.

 

beachycove

Well-known member
Presumably this is a reference to the 4-wire localtalk cables introduced with the Macintosh office in the 80s, and so with the first version of Appletalk networking. This was what was adapted for use with the PhoneNet adapters that required 4-wire telephone wiring.

Another way of putting what the manual is saying would be to say that the printer (being a serial device rather than an Appletalk device) will not work over PhoneNet. I doubt that the attempt to use PhoneNet would damage the device electrically, though trying to plug a 4-pin localtalk cable into it without one of the localtalk adapters could damage one or the other physically if you went at it too enthusiastically!

A serial cable, using the connection mentioned, is what is needed for any StyleWriter serial printer. Assuming that is what you do have, therefore, it follows that it is not truly a "localtalk" cable -- though that mistake in nomenclature is often made.

The confusion arises undoubtedly because the round mini-din plugs looked much the same through different implementations in the Macintosh family, because the cabling in each case looked more or less identical (but was really different), and also because the ports on the machines (and even some of the cabling!) could be dual-purposed for serial and localtalk connections. It was an elegant system in the cosmetic sense, by which I mean that it did not involve the "clunky" cables required for parallel printers and such in the IBM-compatible world of the time. However, it was not especially clear-cut what worked with what, even back then when real work depended on getting it right.

 

classic

Well-known member
Thanks for the enlightenment on the intricacies of an appletalk (serial) cable.

I had no idea just how many serial cables there are!

I ended up using the gray cable (8-pins) and it works fine.

I'm taking pics with my quicktake 100 and then printing out.

The resolution is not great (interpolation) but its good fun in a retro mac way.

Its quite a neat and fast little printer. I get about 5 (B&W) pages a minute.

And its going to print for a long time.

I have 20+ cartridges!

Cheers mates!

 

beachycove

Well-known member
Those cartridges could be extended indefinitely by buying some Canon ink. All you do is put ink on the sponge (which is exposed) until the thing will accept no more. The printhead is separate and can be separately cleaned with alcohol.

I have a 2200 also, and rather like it. Colour is also surprisingly good.

 
Top