H3NRY
Well-known member
Gaaahhh! Part numbers! In any big company everything has a part number, and that number may be on the part someplace. There is a number for the board artwork, that is the layout of the traces. There is a number for the silk screen legends. There is a number for the bare board. There is a number for the board stuffed with components. There is a functional number, ie power / sweep for 128K, different from power / sweep for Plus. There is usually a bar code to identify the part for warehousing, and of course a part number for the bar code label itself, which may also be on the label. Every one of these items requires a complete spec sheet, which is why engineers go crazy trying to crank out all the paper work. Each spec sheet has its own part number, too!
So every time somebody changes a capacitor spec, the assembled board spec has to be rev'd, the bill of materials for every higher assembly in which the board is used has to be rev'd, the spec sheets for the bar code labels have to be rev'd... it's a wonder anything at all gets done. At I*M it took 3 days to revise the spec sheet for a bar code sticker because the format of a specification was so complex and precise (and undocumented). All to change one part on an assembly and bump it from rev c to rev d.
As a result, there's great pressure to use parts already in the company's system. There may be a new better part available, but you know it'll take you two weeks of paperwork to request the part, and it'll take purchasing 3 months to qualify and approve the part. Not that they do any actual tests mind you, they request statistical failure data, reliability guestimates, costs, production levels, production ramp rates, etc. etc. And if a competitor takes a purchasing manager out to a very nice lunch, you may be asked to redo everything for the competing part. xx(
So every time somebody changes a capacitor spec, the assembled board spec has to be rev'd, the bill of materials for every higher assembly in which the board is used has to be rev'd, the spec sheets for the bar code labels have to be rev'd... it's a wonder anything at all gets done. At I*M it took 3 days to revise the spec sheet for a bar code sticker because the format of a specification was so complex and precise (and undocumented). All to change one part on an assembly and bump it from rev c to rev d.
As a result, there's great pressure to use parts already in the company's system. There may be a new better part available, but you know it'll take you two weeks of paperwork to request the part, and it'll take purchasing 3 months to qualify and approve the part. Not that they do any actual tests mind you, they request statistical failure data, reliability guestimates, costs, production levels, production ramp rates, etc. etc. And if a competitor takes a purchasing manager out to a very nice lunch, you may be asked to redo everything for the competing part. xx(