• Updated 2023-07-12: Hello, Guest! Welcome back, and be sure to check out this follow-up post about our outage a week or so ago.

GBSCSI - A cheap(er?) solution to replacement storage

GRudolf94

Well-known member
So, a while ago I designed these, and they've finally been cleaned up and tested enough for release (well, some variants):


Why: I wanted a board done my way. Figured I might as well. I can get drives for my countless janky UNIX workstations, the occasional desktop Mac PCB, and PowerBooks, all with a single design. I might be biased, but I think it's a neat design and a decent compromise between quality/layout/signal integrity, price and form factor.

At the time, standalone RP2040 2.5/3.5", Pi Pico 2.5/3.5", Pi Pico 3.5" HDD footprint and DB25 variants were designed, plus a carrier card that fits SCA connectors in workstations which I haven't yet had the opportunity to test and verify mechanics on.

Turnkey units are available from https://decromancer.ca (a friend's store, no further affiliation - I am not making money selling these).

Comments and feedback are welcome.
1712382639877.png
 

GRudolf94

Well-known member
Will be watching to see when the SCA variant(s) are avaiable!
I don't plan on integrating the SCA connector to a separate variant - not unless the carrier board doesn't work :)
Do you have some benchmarks?
Running ZuluSCSI firmware, it should bench the same - about 9ish MB/s read, if the host can go the distance. Half the devices I plan on using it for only do SCSI-1 and, as such, are stuck at 5MB/s, so no good machine for benchmarks on my end.
 

ScutBoy

Well-known member
I don't plan on integrating the SCA connector to a separate variant - not unless the carrier board doesn't work :)

Running ZuluSCSI firmware, it should bench the same - about 9ish MB/s read, if the host can go the distance. Half the devices I plan on using it for only do SCSI-1 and, as such, are stuck at 5MB/s, so no good machine for benchmarks on my end.

Carrier board is fine :)
 
Top