As long as the terminator is within (IIRC) 3" of the end of the cable it is within specification. So a passthrough terminator right before the SCA adapter will be fine, provided that the SCA adapter/hard drive.
Depending on the cost of a pass-through terminator, consider getting a good SCA adapter, which can provide termination, instead:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/111035026224?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
Then all you need is the SCA adapter, and no additional pass-through terminator.
I'd really like to find a SCA adapter like the one I just listed for less than $10. There's not that much difference in component count between it and the $3 ones, but for some reason, the ones which can actually let you configure your SCSI chain properly cost seven times as much.
"Single-Ended" has nothing to do with termination. SCSI went through several versions, starting with just SCSI, then SCSI-2, which included the enhancement Fast SCSI-2, then Ultra-SCSI. After Ultra-SCSI, came Ultra2-SCSI and everything was LVD SCSI, which stands for Low Voltage Differential.
Everything which is not LVD SCSI is Single-Ended (SE) SCSI. Only, we never called it that, because we didn't really need a special name for it, until LVD became common. Until LVD came along there was nothing to distinguish early SCSI from (except early differential SCSI of HVD SCSI, but everyone has happily forgotten about that).
The reason why SCSI is separated into early SE SCSI and later LVD SCSI is because the analog method of sending the digital signals changed. In single ended SCSI each signal just has one wire. The electronics compare that wire against GND and determine whether it is low or high (0 or 1). But low and high are kind murky. Low might be anything under 2V. High might be anything over 3V. The range in between might be uncertain, or different for each wire.
In low voltage differential SCSI, each signal has two wires. For a 1 one wire is high and the other low. For a 0 the previous situation is reversed. There is no GND, which just sits at 0 all the time, involved in the signal. The electronics have a much easier time comparing these two wires, and just deciding which is higher in order to determine 0 or 1.
So old SCSI is Single Ended. Only 1 wire changes to indicate the data value. Newer SCSI is differential. Two wires are compared (the difference is found) and their relative state determines the value of the data. Newer SCSI is usually built so that it is capable of using the old signaling method. The second wire for each signal just becomes a GND wire and the signal wire is interpreted the old way.
Newer SCSI is also called "low voltage" because it uses a lower signaling voltage for its differential signals than the older and mostly forgotten, original differential SCSI. If we had never had old differential SCSI we'd probably just call the new stuff "differential" and leave off the LV.
There's a wealth of information here: http://www.scsifaq.org Or, there used to be. I haven't read the site in a long time to see if it is still good. But these old UseNet derived FAQ sites don't usually change much.
Strangely, the Wikipedia article doesn't reference it. But then the Wiki article gets a few other things about SCSI wrong too.
Depending on the cost of a pass-through terminator, consider getting a good SCA adapter, which can provide termination, instead:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/111035026224?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
Then all you need is the SCA adapter, and no additional pass-through terminator.
I'd really like to find a SCA adapter like the one I just listed for less than $10. There's not that much difference in component count between it and the $3 ones, but for some reason, the ones which can actually let you configure your SCSI chain properly cost seven times as much.
"Single-Ended" has nothing to do with termination. SCSI went through several versions, starting with just SCSI, then SCSI-2, which included the enhancement Fast SCSI-2, then Ultra-SCSI. After Ultra-SCSI, came Ultra2-SCSI and everything was LVD SCSI, which stands for Low Voltage Differential.
Everything which is not LVD SCSI is Single-Ended (SE) SCSI. Only, we never called it that, because we didn't really need a special name for it, until LVD became common. Until LVD came along there was nothing to distinguish early SCSI from (except early differential SCSI of HVD SCSI, but everyone has happily forgotten about that).
The reason why SCSI is separated into early SE SCSI and later LVD SCSI is because the analog method of sending the digital signals changed. In single ended SCSI each signal just has one wire. The electronics compare that wire against GND and determine whether it is low or high (0 or 1). But low and high are kind murky. Low might be anything under 2V. High might be anything over 3V. The range in between might be uncertain, or different for each wire.
In low voltage differential SCSI, each signal has two wires. For a 1 one wire is high and the other low. For a 0 the previous situation is reversed. There is no GND, which just sits at 0 all the time, involved in the signal. The electronics have a much easier time comparing these two wires, and just deciding which is higher in order to determine 0 or 1.
So old SCSI is Single Ended. Only 1 wire changes to indicate the data value. Newer SCSI is differential. Two wires are compared (the difference is found) and their relative state determines the value of the data. Newer SCSI is usually built so that it is capable of using the old signaling method. The second wire for each signal just becomes a GND wire and the signal wire is interpreted the old way.
Newer SCSI is also called "low voltage" because it uses a lower signaling voltage for its differential signals than the older and mostly forgotten, original differential SCSI. If we had never had old differential SCSI we'd probably just call the new stuff "differential" and leave off the LV.
There's a wealth of information here: http://www.scsifaq.org Or, there used to be. I haven't read the site in a long time to see if it is still good. But these old UseNet derived FAQ sites don't usually change much.
Strangely, the Wikipedia article doesn't reference it. But then the Wiki article gets a few other things about SCSI wrong too.