• Updated 2023-07-12: Hello, Guest! Welcome back, and be sure to check out this follow-up post about our outage a week or so ago.

An LC 575 - about time!

jsarchibald

Well-known member
Well, here it is, the first computer I ever owned, an LC 575 (LC_575 will be happy!).

The one I had was a late 1994 model, with 5MB of RAM and a 160MB HDD. This one is slightly specced up, with 8MB of RAM and a 250MB HDD. It has been 16 years since we bought the LC, and I think my parents sold it in 2000. The funny thing about this computer is that I put up a Wanted thread on a local forum and was contacted by a guy who was going to throw the LC out. He said that he was going to have to pay to dump it, so he may as well ship it up to me (at his cost). So, the computer cost me nothing, and I am very thankful for his generosity (the packing and postage would have been over $150, but he was happy to pay the whole lot).

It came with the original install CD, LC 575 manual, Macintosh Manual, AppleCD 300i Plus Manual, ADB keyboard, mouse and even power cord. I basically got an entire system, sans box. They had formatted the drive with a fresh install on it, and I have to say, it booted up very quickly for an old 33MHz system (LC_575, not sure what you mean by slow – then again, this is a fresh install with no extensions or programs…). Running System 7.1 (although our one had 7.5.1?).

I took it apart and cleaned all of the dust out of her, and she is as good as new. I have learned that, although you get a new purchase, it is best to clean it and check it all out properly before just firing her up. It had quite a bit of dust (16 years will do that), but once cleaned out, it looked great. It didn’t even have too much weathering, which is ironic because our original one started rusting badly after a year or so. And that Trinitron screen!

Anyway, I wouldn’t normally go on about a mid 90s machine with relatively low specs, but this one has a special place, the one that kicked it off for me. I convinced my parents to pay for it after getting the old brochures from our local shop (you know, the white ones with a black tab, a small picture, specs and marketing guff on a one pager).

Funny to think we paid over $3,000 for our one back in the day…

DSCF0148.jpg.85bc74901e58e2bcf2e7c151b8410f9f.jpg


DSCF0146.jpg.1b1b1f18d204ce513f5de7bf306d03d3.jpg


DSCF0147.jpg.8168b21b013718c851b9d2154e318192.jpg


DSCF0149.jpg.c0b98099620cdecd04919270d2b8e1f4.jpg


 

jsarchibald

Well-known member
I was considering it, but it seems to run fast enough on its own. I was very surprised, I was expecting a very slow computer and ended up with a delightful little machine.

 

LC_575

Well-known member
Nice! I'm happy that someone actually appreciates this Mac, as opposed to someone who sees it as a Mac worthy of violating for a Color Classic's sake. It's a decent machine, compact and easy to work on, and IMO the best of the LC series (screw the 580 - it has IDE! And no Trinitron!).

The one I have is the same model you used to have. The HD has now been upped to 1.2GB, but the memory remains original. It also has a auto-inject FDD (which I added), giving that extra nice Apple touch.

 

jsarchibald

Well-known member
They're just a good, solid, stable machine that does what it is asked to do.

The only problem I have is the floppy drive is having trouble. What did you replace yours with? I have a few spare Power Mac G3s that I could use drives out of if I need to.

 

LC_575

Well-known member
My current drive is from a IIx, modified to fit. The old, original drive is fine; I just prefer auto-inject. If you'd like I'll sell it to you, guaranteed to work.

 

Concorde1993

Well-known member
The all-in-one LC-series Macs were as ugly as sin (I personally prefer the 5200-5500 series design; very elegant), but capable at 33Mhz if running System 7.5.5, or earlier (System 7.6.1 & OS 8 really lagged down these units, as witnessed in my early years at elementary school).

Congrats on your find, JS. Now imagine if that LC had been a Director's Edition Performa...that really would have been something extraordinary. :beige:

200th post, btw.

 

jsarchibald

Well-known member
I've also got a PM 5500, but it lacks the charm the LC does. It must be my nostalgia.

I'll find a Director's Edition one day, I've seen about 3 pop up over the last 4 months or so.

PS - You actually track how many posts you make?

 

MacJunky

Well-known member
Nobody cares how many posts you make. Please, there is a reason that post count is not shown in threads on this forum.

 

Concorde1993

Well-known member
PS - You actually track how many posts you make?
I checkup on my profile card from time-to-time, and I finally noticed the post counter (which had hit 200). On the Apple Support threads, a user's post count is shown on the left hand side of the screen on each thread that is generated (not sure why they would do that). Obviously here the user's post counts are hidden, which is probably done not to piss off our fellow members like MacJunky, and to make the threads appear more efficient.

I'll find a Director's Edition one day, I've seen about 3 pop up over the last 4 months or so.
That's quite amazing. The ones you have seen, are they a complete set, or broken up (i.e., no keyboard, software, etc.)?

 

jsarchibald

Well-known member
They have been just the computer, or the computer with keyboard and mouse. Obviously I'd like one as complete as possible, but if it is local, I won't be complaining. And I'll be sure to let people know in Conquests.

 

Cory5412

Daring Pioneer of the Future
Staff member
Congrats on the 575! One of my first 68k Macs was a Performa 578 that I got for cheap locally from a garage sale. Over the time I had it, mine ultimately received 36mb of memory, a 4gb disk and the 40MHz full'040 chip (although it ran at 33 I think) from my first Quadra 840av, when it kicked the bucket. I then moved and had given it to a friend who almost immediately recycled it, which was a shame given its maxed out nature.

Obviously here the user's post counts are hidden, which is probably done not to piss off our fellow members like MacJunky, and to make the threads appear more efficient.
It was done a few years ago when a lot of people got overly concerned about having the most posts, and would frequently post "me too" or "cool" or other extremely short messages of dubious usefulness in an effort to perform what we called at the time "PostCount++" They would proceed to then post about how many posts they had.

As MacJunky said, in a forum where people are using realistic measures of contribution and attitude to form their opinion about the version of you that exists on the Internet, your post count doesn't matter anyway.

 
Top