Jump to content

Turbo SE accelerator


Recommended Posts

I have a Mac SE with a Mac Memory Turbo SE accelerator.  This board has a 16Mhz 68000, a 68881 math coprocessor, and 4 Meg RAM.  It works very well, but I do not have any drivers or documentation for it.  Does anyone out there have more information (or the software) for this board?

 

Thanks,

Rick

 

TurboSE.JPG

MacMemory.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it does appear to have a PDS pass-thru connector on the back edge, but it is only labeled P1 so with out documentation I cant be sure what it is.

 

The board has 4 SIMM sockets on it each populated with 1 Meg SIMMS, the ROMs are pulled from the SE logic board and installed on the Turbo SE board.  There also is a small amount of RAM on the SE logic board, only 2 SIMMs, I am guessing they are 256K but I did not verify this.   There appears to be no hacks on the main board, everything is cleanly interfaced thru the PDS slot.

 

The finder reports the system as having 4Meg RAM, Speedometer reports the system as running about twice the speed of a stock SE, but Speedometer does not see the FPU.  Sound seems to work OK.  

 

Rick 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweet, sounds like the drivers must be in ROM on board if it's up and running at 16MHz. Not sure anything but detection at startup should be required for the 68000 to use the CoPro automagically? Prolly wrong on that. Run TattleTech to see if it detects the FPU and reports anything else interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have exactly the same card in one of my SE, but without appropriate driver too :-(

There are several jumpers on the card, with explanation on the back (I tried many configurations to test...)IMG_3186.thumb.JPG.068e429932ce439bdf2fc5e2568f683b.JPG

 

IMG_2406.thumb.JPG.47260d94aa45f3e1a89f3d7ca6f94ff6.JPG

 

It works very well, but It seems the copro is not used (may be a patch is necessary...)

In using Speedometer, the score of the CPU is better (x2) but only a small gap for the FPU.

The score is better with the ROM on the card which run to 16Mhz.

It is necessary to keep at least 2 RAM (256Ko) on the motherboard to work.

5b1c37f85ef4b_IMG_3187copie.JPG.b5f6390a4d9c41e771895fd6e75a652c.JPG

 

Anyway, the difference in using the Mac is visible.

Last thing, in my card the proc is a 68HC000 version (low power for laptop), I don't know why ?

Edited by gpbonneau
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

I found a test of this card in BYTE from March 1988.
https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1988-03/page/n157

This confirms that I need an INIT software to use the 68881. But no way to find it

 

If anyone has it ...

 

It also explains the use of the connector on the card, which was an option for a video card for an E-Machine Big Picture screen:

 

BYTE-03-88.thumb.jpg.c9b3f631a1b34b3aed25fdc4f9467d35.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...