Jump to content

Head hurts, IIvi versus IIvx


Recommended Posts

Well I decided to open it up further. Mine has an 030 at 33Mhz with an FPU. Good! So that is spec for a IIvx. Wonder why Apple advertised it at 32MHz?

 

So my guess is -A came out for IIvx. Then -B was a revision which was used for the:

 

IIvx (32mhz 030 with FPU) (replaced -A board)

IIvi (16Mhz with no FPU)

Performa 600 (32mhz with no FPU)

 

The ones with no FPU seem to have had a socket to add one. So this makes more sense, -B might be a more "universal" board to accommodate the 16Mhz 030?

Edited by unity
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...