Jump to content
iamdigitalman

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs?

Recommended Posts

Shit, if this is true then it's no wonder the Newton never caught on.

 

I don't think available software was the main problem for the early Newton. In fact, I think the success of the Palm demonstrates the opposite: the Palm is much less 'computer' than the Newton is. I'd say most people use the built-in apps almost exclusively, and it gets them right. It's got a great calendar and notebook which sync properly, and it's got an input method that's not going to make you want to pull your hair out - even if you don't happen to speak English. The first Newtons weren't very good in these respects, and I think that's what doomed them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of the waveLan driver (of which I know nothing except that it exists), what was the last version you tried? The last version available on the site is 1.08a and Mark Hoekstra (Deceased) claimed on his site (http://geektechnique.org/projectlab/669/getting-your-emate-wireless) that the latest version (1.08a)worked fine with all the functions despite being unregistered. That was in July 2006.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If a programmer ceases support of a product they should either make an unprotected full version available for distribution...their software will be made available in unprotected form.

 

And in fact, many do. Look at all the Abandonware that's been legally released for old Macs, for example. It just makes us sad pandas when someone forgets to or can't do this.

 

While we're reviving old dead threads.........

 

Just watch out for "Abandonware" and "legally released" in the same sentence. Yes, many programmers have done this; but many more have *NOT*. In fact, the term "abandonware" is usually used to refer specifically to software that *hasn't* been "legally released" by its author. Once it has, it becomes "freeware". (Like iCab 2.9.9. It's not 'abandoned', it's just 'free' now.) The term abandonware is generally used when referring to non-free software that is so old and forgotten that the original author either can't be found to ask for permission, or has never given specific permission, but has not made an effort to block its distribution, either.

 

For example, old Apple OSes are not "abandonware" because either: A. Apple makes it available for free (6.0.8, 7.5.5,) or B. They block attempts to release (the oldest Mac systems, OS 9, etc.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually a relevant thread. If you look at all the free help offered on NTLK list over the years... in relation to all that free help in the Newton community, Newton developers still in existence that charge for their software are a tad greedy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did the eMate-wireless trick from geektechnique and it works!

 

Dead thread or not, suckers like myself keep reading them every now and then.

 

Jelle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×