Didn't Think C 5.0 add some kind of object support? It wasn't C++ but I thought there was something extra there beyond C.Apart from Code Warrior is PowerPC/68k and C/C++ where as Think C is 68k and C only?Does anyone have any comparisons between Code Warrior and Think C?
Symantec C++ is both PPC and 68k.
Does anyone have a Taxonomy of the various CodeWarrior versions and what they did/supported. I bought something like CodeWarrior Gold 10 or 11 way back when. Then the Pro versions started the numbering over again, I think. And there were student versions mixed in there somehow.This might be legal gray area, but CodeWarrior Pro 7.1 is available at a certain popular abandonware website.
Fortunately someone uploaded it to MacintoshGarden.does anyone have/know where to get the ol Freepascal for OS9? (I *think* it would be v2.0.2 or earlier.) Thanks.
Thank you, Cameron. It may be nine months later but it's still timely. I'll probably get around to writing code some time coincident with the heat death of the universe. Plenty of project ideas. So little time and skill.I don't remember the exact taxonomy, but the Gold CodeWarriors are pretty much hopeless for any code that's even remotely modern, so I use the Pro versions. I have CW 5, 6, 7 and 8. CW 6 is the last 68K version (I use CW 5 most of the time for 68K projects, however), and CW 7 is the first one to support Carbon. I don't remember when Mach-O capability was added (I think 8 ).
I don't know anything about the Windows or Java capabilities; I don't use those.
I think John Klos has a mirror of it on his ftp site.(One of us really need to mirror this copy of ftp.apple.com before it disappears too!)
In case any of you guys are interested in looking (and maybe laughing at :lol: ) some recent code created for 68k macs, have a look at our retrochallenge entry's source in this thread: http://68kmla.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=16623 :b&w:Why aren't people developing anymore for the classic Mac, even if just for the heck of it?