Any chance we can get an early build?Yes, still working on it when I find the time.
It's not pretty to look at, lot's of debug tracing etc. It's built from the bottom up, so not useable as a browser, but just rendering stage to do. It's going to sound awful, but I'll try and make a Christmas present of something to see.Any chance we can get an early build?Yes, still working on it when I find the time.
Very close!!!Do you have a name for it yet? I have a suggestion: 6Browse.
maybe even 68rowse :b&w: 1337Very close!!!Do you have a name for it yet? I have a suggestion: 6Browse.
I'm calling it "Browser6" at the moment.![]()
Oh, I thought it should bemaybe even 68rowse :b&w: 1337
What is the creator/type associated with HTML files?Will it be able to open local .html files? I recall one browser that wouldn't let you do that.
I didn't think html files had resource forks... When I get back on my PowerBook 3400 I'll take a look.What is the creator/type associated with HTML files?Will it be able to open local .html files? I recall one browser that wouldn't let you do that.
It'sI don't know what the point of this is.
You don't want a Macintosh application then? The Macintosh approach is that file extensions are for Neanderthals. The file type is held within the finder info, not the name of the file.why not have it trust the file type (extension)?
I'm only supporting GIFs at the moment. I'll look at the possibility of PNG once the rendering is done.porter, is browsersix supporting inline images, or calling an externat da/app?
If you had to go one format only, I'd say let it be PNG. GIF is a dinosaur. Does anybody really make new images in GIF format?I'm only supporting GIFs at the moment. I'll look at the possibility of PNG once the rendering is done.
Many website banners are GIFs.If you had to go one format only, I'd say let it be PNG. GIF is a dinosaur. Does anybody really make new images in GIF format?