• Hello MLAers! We've re-enabled auto-approval for accounts. If you are still waiting on account approval, please check this thread for more information.

System 6 Browser Development Opinions

Porter would you like to /consider coding a IIGS version alongside the sys6.0.8 version?

Using mpw-IIGS aand mpw -C this is 'easy'

What say you?

Its requirements are mpw 3.0 and a floppy drive.

 
Porter would you like to /consider coding a IIGS version alongside the sys6.0.8 version?
No, I'd be more interested in doing an "OS/2 Presentation Manager" and or a BeOS port.

But for now, I think I've still got a fair way to go before we have something useable. But providing the source and build environments will permit others to tinker.

 
Porter, does it render HTML yet? I'd like to give the windows version a try.
No rendering HTML yet, it does all the parsing etc, but I wanted to do all the "cross platform" conformance first at that will set the tone for how I do the rendering. Also, being able to write and debug the rendering using Xcode will vastly improve matters.

I'll throw the win32 binary in the package.

 
Will this, when done, be comparable to the old versions of Netscape o something? Will it have javascript or css support?

EDIT: And may I suggest a name for the entire engine instead of naming each platform something different?

 
Will this, when done, be comparable to the old versions of Netscape o something? Will it have javascript or css support?
EDIT: And may I suggest a name for the entire engine instead of naming each platform something different?
No CSS, no Javascript, no JVM plugin, no Applets, no ActiveX, no HTTPS, no QuickTime, no jpeg, no png.

Yes to tables, lists, cookies, proxies and forms.

I'm sticking with "browser6" for the basename of everything. It's what I've put in all the source copyright banners.

You will enjoy the new icon.

 
I've delivered a new drop to Mr Tetris so peeps can have a play.

I'm most interested in

(a) running on a variety of System 6 operating systems

( B) on different machines

© with different depths of colour, eg 1,2,4,8,16 and 24(32) bits

(d) running on anything other than System 6, what works and what doesn't. Ideally for Mac OS X, grab the one of the Carbon builds.

(e) that entering URLs gives expected results in the title bars and debug window.

I want it confirmed that GIFs are always rendered reasonably appropriately.

The menus always seem to be right, and the about dialog comes up.

Stay clear of "File->Open HTML etc" File Open can only really do GIFs at the moment.

No networking for Carbon yet.

There is a story behind the icon.

 
Porter, are you using an emu to run mpw?
ah no matter i see here G3 B& W running Tiger and here - Mac plus.

I wonder if mpw runs on mini vmac without having debug and edit problems......

 
I wonder if mpw runs on mini vmac without having debug and edit problems......
I can run MPW 3.2 and THINK C 5.0 on a 68000 with System 6.0.8. They will do complete compiles. MPW 3.2 will also run on System 8.6 on PPC.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And BrowserX fails to run on 10.4.11, although Browser9 works.
I'm running 10.4.11 on a BW G3. What does it do? How does it fail, what is the error code? What component says it doesn't run? Are you running it from the Finder?

 
hmm i see an opportunity for a 286 version of browser(28 )6 for anyone who would take up the mantle.
Do you mean OS2 1.3? There is no winsock before Windows 3.0.

However it would be possible to make it a 16bit Windows for Workgroups program on i386. From memory the only browsers for that required WIN32S.

 
Back
Top