This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.
This is known to me. 9.0.4 does somewhat better. If I can get the overflow code back in (see issue 65), then the site works 100%.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
Just because we use this site to discuss old macs it doesn't mean we have to be able to work on this forum with said old macs. I, for one, have absolutely not interest in browsing the web with my old machines, I like to do with them what was intended, and while they were made to handle HTML/FTP/Gopher they're not particularly well known for processing javascript, CSS, and ajax.It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
Obviously I'm slightly biased given my project, but why not? It's not like the site can't gracefully degrade for older tech (it's themeable after all). There are always reasonable compromises that can be made for accessibility, and it *is* fun to get older machines doing modern tasks if for no other reason than to say you can. (Or, in my case, because you actually prefer the older Mac OS.)Just because we use this site to discuss old macs it doesn't mean we have to be able to work on this forum with said old macs. I, for one, have absolutely not interest in browsing the web with my old machines, I like to do with them what was intended, and while they were made to handle HTML/FTP/Gopher they're not particularly well known for processing javascript, CSS, and ajax.It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
If you read the Classilla site, they recommend using iCab for sites where you have to use CSS or turn them off in Classilla because the support is not good. Of course, if you're still surfing using Classic, any browser you use is going to have trouble with modern web content.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
How timely. Tonight I'm posting from my current internal build of the forthcoming Classilla 9.1. And may I say the MLA has never looked better in it. Watch for it coming soon.If you read the Classilla site, they recommend using iCab for sites where you have to use CSS or turn them off in Classilla because the support is not good. Of course, if you're still surfing using Classic, any browser you use is going to have trouble with modern web content.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
![]()
And most of the target audience of this site also has at least one computer capable of using a reasonably modern browser so it's not really an issue.![]()
![]()
I'l have to try it on my G3 then :beige:How timely. Tonight I'm posting from my current internal build of the forthcoming Classilla 9.1. And may I say the MLA has never looked better in it. Watch for it coming soon.If you read the Classilla site, they recommend using iCab for sites where you have to use CSS or turn them off in Classilla because the support is not good. Of course, if you're still surfing using Classic, any browser you use is going to have trouble with modern web content.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
![]()
And most of the target audience of this site also has at least one computer capable of using a reasonably modern browser so it's not really an issue.![]()
![]()
![]()
Sounds interesting. Glad to see it is still improving. Every little bit brings it that much closer to the modern era. How's it run under Sheepsaver with 9.0.4? My new Powerbook G4, which is my fastest classic capable machine, came loaded with Leopard so no classic mode for me.How timely. Tonight I'm posting from my current internal build of the forthcoming Classilla 9.1. And may I say the MLA has never looked better in it. Watch for it coming soon.If you read the Classilla site, they recommend using iCab for sites where you have to use CSS or turn them off in Classilla because the support is not good. Of course, if you're still surfing using Classic, any browser you use is going to have trouble with modern web content.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
![]()
And most of the target audience of this site also has at least one computer capable of using a reasonably modern browser so it's not really an issue.![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't officially support Sheepshaver, but I am told that it works fine in it. Classilla will run on 8.6 and up (8.5 under duress), so Mac OS 9.0.4 should be no problem.Sounds interesting. Glad to see it is still improving. Every little bit brings it that much closer to the modern era. How's it run under Sheepsaver with 9.0.4? My new Powerbook G4, which is my fastest classic capable machine, came loaded with Leopard so no classic mode for me.How timely. Tonight I'm posting from my current internal build of the forthcoming Classilla 9.1. And may I say the MLA has never looked better in it. Watch for it coming soon.If you read the Classilla site, they recommend using iCab for sites where you have to use CSS or turn them off in Classilla because the support is not good. Of course, if you're still surfing using Classic, any browser you use is going to have trouble with modern web content.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
![]()
And most of the target audience of this site also has at least one computer capable of using a reasonably modern browser so it's not really an issue.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We better be careful or Bunsen will show up and lecture us about nesting quotes. :lol:I don't officially support Sheepshaver, but I am told that it works fine in it. Classilla will run on 8.6 and up (8.5 under duress), so Mac OS 9.0.4 should be no problem.Sounds interesting. Glad to see it is still improving. Every little bit brings it that much closer to the modern era. How's it run under Sheepsaver with 9.0.4? My new Powerbook G4, which is my fastest classic capable machine, came loaded with Leopard so no classic mode for me.How timely. Tonight I'm posting from my current internal build of the forthcoming Classilla 9.1. And may I say the MLA has never looked better in it. Watch for it coming soon.If you read the Classilla site, they recommend using iCab for sites where you have to use CSS or turn them off in Classilla because the support is not good. Of course, if you're still surfing using Classic, any browser you use is going to have trouble with modern web content.This site requires turning off stylesheets when viewed with Classilla 9.0 (View->Use Style->None), each time the link is opened in a fresh window/tab. It's somewhat ironic, considering the target audience of this site.![]()
![]()
And most of the target audience of this site also has at least one computer capable of using a reasonably modern browser so it's not really an issue.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't have an ETA for Classilla 9.1, but it will be "soon." In the meantime, Classilla 9.0.4 does rather better on the MLA if you turn on the experimental renderer (View > Use Experimental Renderer or Cmd-Shift-X). This overrides certain settings in layout with laxer ones. While it makes the site kind of messy, everything should show up and be clickable.
Bah! I'm going to be a }
You should AT LEAST do some basic smoothing. That'd look much better if you ran it through hq4x or something
Sometimes, the pixelation is a desired part of the effect.You should AT LEAST do some basic smoothing. That'd look much better if you ran it through hq4x or something