A big limitation is that the freely accessible LLMs have limited knowledge of vintage hardware and retro programming so struggle to produce usable results. To get good results you have to spend time preparing the AI with rules, information, examples, documentation, then spend time, much time, walking it through.
It is an amazing tool and a force multiplier, allowing an individual to do the work of a team, but in the same way that an Airbrush doesn't make you a better artist than a crayon, you still need to put in time, effort and skill.
Long and short, ChatGPT is probably useless at HyperTalk out of the box, but if you provide documentation, and use agents to review each others code, develop tests to define success and sit interrogating and troubleshooting the problems with the AI, you'll potentially write the next Myst in a lot less time than it took Cyan.
The problem with the post at the start of this thread was that the quality of the hardware element was a bit low. The files were presented as first pass solutions requiring a little tweeking... But in fact didn't even open in the software they were supposedly for. That... Was... discouraging for a project. I'm been polite with that description to be honest, and ignoring the manner it was presented.