The forum software must be pre-parsing signatures. Otherwise, smilies would disappear as soon as they were disabled.
Now that you have brought it to my attention with your pithy sig commentary: a note to the wise!
You are
very lucky that the forum software isn't parsing for signatures containing advertisements for commercial interests, (AKA Spam) try to keep a bit lower profile, comrade!
The link to Adopt a Mac in my signature has been tolerated since I first opened the store over a year ago.
If I were you, I'd rethink that, the link doesn't bother me personally as it now stands. That said, your link has been been a topic of concern in the "war room," ergo, my concern and advice: "try to keep a bit lower profile, comrade!"
"Barely tolerated," would more
much more accurately reflect the impression I've gotten in my study of the records in the War Room. If you have any question about that, please feel free to PM the other mods and find out for yourself.
The link is not spam and I don't appreciate being compared to spammers.
If you got that impression from my post, I apologize. Please reread my post carefully and re-consider the meaning of the words I tried to chose carefully.
However, I
did mean to imply that carping that emticons being prohibited in sigs was cramping your ability to recreate your Store's Logo in your sig might very well be considered pushing
just a bit too hard on the envelope. Creating a "Billboard" with your stores logo in your sig would almost certainly cross "the blurry line" between a "low profile" link to a legitimate source of 68kMLA "stuff" as opposed to an, in your face, "Signboard" which I assure you, will be considered
inappropriate, if not outright spam by the majority of the mods.
I'm only trying to curb your youthful, impetuous nature a bit, just as I did in the "NetBook" thread. Please consider that my post was done out of concern for both yourself and the rest of our Band of Brothers (and sisters) here at the 68kMLA.
I also wanted to try to get off the "emoticons in sigs" debate and return to, more serious, on topic discussion.
Sincerely,