• Updated 2023-07-12: Hello, Guest! Welcome back, and be sure to check out this follow-up post about our outage a week or so ago.

A/UX

Metalchic

Well-known member
umm, given that $795 for the manuals and the CDROM i'm never going to use/get to use A/UX, thats kinda really hefty on the price. like REALLY REALLY hefty. like if i had 800$ i would buy a mac mini not a single pice of software.

 

alk

Well-known member
Good for you. If you don't know what A/UX is and why you won't pay that price anyway, then you should probably think twice about posting to threads like these lest you be labeled a troll.

Peace,

Drew

 

QuadSix50

Well-known member
umm, given that $795 for the manuals and the CDROM i'm never going to use/get to use A/UX, thats kinda really hefty on the price. like REALLY REALLY hefty. like if i had 800$ i would buy a mac mini not a single pice of software.
Most commercial UNIX operating systems, even today, are quite expensive to begin with. I think the only exception is Mac OS X, but when you take into consideration the price of OS X Server then it's not that much different.

 

Cory5412

Daring Pioneer of the Future
Staff member
Agreed with Alk, it's one of those situations where it's best not to say anything, if that which you have to say isn't helpful in any way/shape/form.

Re: cost of unices. What I've noticed is that the best way to get a license to use a UNIX OS is actually to buy the vendor's support contract. I think the $1500/year contract is the only way to get AIX for example, and it's the best way to get SGI IRIX media. I'm sure the situation was the same for SunOS/Solaris back before they decided to do free hobbyist licensing.

Of course, in 1992/1993 when A/UX 3 was new, I'm sure that $800 wasn't really too much for A/UX, especially given it was a system on which you could do unix development and networking, as well as run standard Mac apps. Although the mac you'd run it on would cost a pretty penny (something like a Mac IIci or a Quadra 610, presumably would work fine) it would probably still cost less to get a mac and laserwriter with a/ux than to get a comparable Sun/SGI/IBM/Alpha (or whatever) box.

 

Metalchic

Well-known member
well i said somthing in the hopes that somone would turn up with al ink to a version that wasent so pricy. i wasent trying to troll :(

 

~tl

68kMLA Admin Emeritus
You do realise that A/UX 3 was released in 1992 and that it hasn't been sold for a number of years now (since 1995 ish IIRC). The prices listed on the FAQ are just the RRP from when it was new... they don't really apply now!

 

Unknown_K

Well-known member
I try to have legit software when I can get it for my collection, just got stuffit expander deluxe 5.5 in the mail today (everyone pirates that).

I don't think Apple will hang you if they found out you had a pirate copy of A/UX (I don't think S Jobs cares about anything sold by Apple he had nothing to do with), but they will have a fit if you run a server distributing their old software and they find out(they have to).

Apple probably never released A/UX for free like they did OS 6.08,7.01,7.5.5 etc because they might not own all of it to release it. A/UX was a port of AT&T (at the time) UNIX so its not up to Apple to release it free.

 

Metalchic

Well-known member
i see well i can stick with my Windows 2003 Server then. (i just wanted to try running a mac server lol)

 

Unknown_K

Well-known member
Windows 2000 Server was the last version that had Appleshare support, just to let you know (its nice being able to get my old 68k and PPC machines to grab files natively from a Mac share on a Windows machine).

I have an AWS 95 with legit copies of A/UX 3.1, but the Win2k server is easier and more efficient to use (since I can dump my Amiga and PC files on the same server).

 

bmacsys

Well-known member
well i said somthing in the hopes that somone would turn up with al ink to a version that wasent so pricy. i wasent trying to troll :(
Why weren't you just more straightforward about it in the first place?

 
Top