So here is a detail of it, hosts, files etc.

Report Covers: 7/14/2003 to 7/26/2003 (11 days)
Number of Unique Hosts: 158
Number of External Referers: 70
Number of Requests: 4,343
Total Unsuccessful Requests: 17,314
Average Page Response Time: 7338ms
Average requests/hour: 16.327
Average requests/day: 394.818

Most Popular Browsers (Top 11 Browser Types By Hits)

Hits % Reqs Browser Type
17558 80.29% Unknown
1891 8.65% Netscape 5
898 4.11% Microsoft IE 5
747 3.42% Microsoft IE 6
547 2.50% Opera 7
97 0.44% Compatible (Netscape) -
76 0.35% Opera 6
45 0.21% Lynx 2
5 0.02% Netscape 4
2 0.01% Microsoft IE 4
2 0.01% Robot -

(I would assume the unknown are Mac browsers like Safari etc.)

Most Popular Operating Systems

Hits % Reqs OS Type
17466 79.87% Macintosh
2910 13.31% Win32
1223 5.59% Unknown
269 1.23% Unix

Most Common Bad Requests

Hits Document
71 /scripts/..%5c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
70 /scripts/..S5c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
38 /scripts/root.exe
36 /c/winnt/system32/cmd.exe
36 /MSADC/root.exe
36 /d/winnt/system32/cmd.exe
36 /_mem_bin/..%5c../..%5c../..%5c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
36 /msadc/..%5c../..%5c../..%5c/..Á../..Á../..Á../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
36 /_vti_bin/..%5c../..%5c../..%5c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
35 /scripts/..À¯../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
35 /scripts/..À/../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
35 /scripts/..Áœ../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
35 /scripts/..Á../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
35 /scripts/..%2f../winnt/system32/cmd.exe
14 /announce.php
4 /CD_Archives/Disc_One/AUX
2 /.hash=e327884f88c4d905c1aa44c63c7cc9c58334d243
2 /scripts/..%5c..%5cwinnt/system32/cmd.exe
2 /CD_Archives/Disc_Four/Intel

Daily Hits Report

Hits % Reqs Resp Time Date
3 0.07% 75ms Monday, July 14
2 0.05% 0ms Tuesday, July 15
135 3.11% 37ms Wednesday, July 16
799 18.40% 10703ms Thursday, July 17
554 12.76% 7773ms Friday, July 18
459 10.57% 8939ms Saturday, July 19
441 10.15% 7883ms Sunday, July 20
492 11.33% 7032ms Monday, July 21
378 8.70% 8933ms Tuesday, July 22
392 9.03% 2934ms Wednesday, July 23
434 9.99% 4911ms Thursday, July 24
201 4.63% 1827ms Friday, July 25
53 1.22% 9577ms Saturday, July 26

HTTP Status Summary

HTTP Status Code % Reqs Requests
200 OK 19.27% 4214
206 Partial Content 0.59% 129
302 Moved Temporarily 0.04% 8
304 Not Modified 0.96% 211
401 Unauthorized 0.04% 8
404 Not Found 2.77% 606
499 Send Interrupted 76.32% 16690
Not Implemented 0.01% 2

That's me. Telus somewhow allows us to have our own custom names, although it doesn't really do anything. Internally on my own computer it will call up my server but sadly it doesn't do it outside my network.

Sometimes I think that you are a little un-subtle BoJ (not just you, a few others as well so don't take it personally ). Remember it's the internet and eveyone can 'see' what you post - not just the members of this forum. Similarly the recent threads regarding the demise of 68kmla.com domain name were also sprayed accross these forums. Not as illegal as downloading software, but counterproductive to the cause all the same (the point being in that case that we wanted the domain name back, and the people who 'stole' it could see how much we wanted it, therefore they had more cause to hold onto the name and/or increase their demands for how much $$ it cost to get it back. That whole discussion *should* have been carried out in the War Room) Getting back to the point, while I also am grateful to many people who host files for download, I do think that a little subtlety is called for.

I would bet my left arm that this forum has been visited at least once by legal representatives of Apple, plus many others. The fact that they apparently let us get away with it is a godsend. How long that will last is another question. If we blatantly discuss what is technically an illegal activity then we are asking for trouble.

Flash!
a.k.a The Voice of Reason

PS. where you have listed the "Hits % Reqs Host" you have also listed a number of personal IP addresses (or at least the IP of the computer at the time) All I can say is "gee thanks a lot - if I give you my phone number can you post that as well?"

- - - - - - - - - - - - -
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it sure beats a blank stare for starting a conversation.

BoJ has lost a tonne of respect from me for this error in judgement (no pun intended). It's not just a question of whether your local computer is hackerproof or not, but whether or not you wanted your geographical location revealed to all and sundry. This is an invasion of other people's privacy.

To answer your question ML5..... I would have to agree with myself

- - - - - - - - - - - - -
oops, my bad. it seems that BoJ did list the IP addresses with percent signs in them in the original post. However as i have pointed out, the text to the right of the IP resolves back to the numerical address so while the intention may have been to keep everyone anonymous BoJ forgot the backwards resolution. Still bad, but it get's 50% of my respect back.

Don't forget that IP privacy was only half my point. The other point is that we should barely even be discussing software downloads, let alone discussing the most popular!

then, there was a ROM file for a mac, (for those of us who can't get them our selves... or who might not have a mac...

and then there was photoshop 3...

pShop 3 is so old, I doubt that adobe cares about anything older than pShop 6 anymore...

A lack of intelligence on my part.

One more reason posting when under the influence of near sleep experience is a bad thing.

quote:

---

ML5 I'm assuming that was you who edited the IP's.

---

"**** em" - Jobs in regards to customers
Warrior maclover5
68kMLA
Official 68kMLA Detective
Number of 68ks Liberated: 7
Number of Contraband (PPC) Liberated from the Dumpster: 1

- - - - - - - - - - - - -
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it sure beats a blank stare for starting a conversation.

68k Macintosh Liberation Army Forums

© 2001-2003 68kMLA