All right. If we operate under the assumption that that DE-9 port is anything "PC compatible" then it has to be either MDA or CGA, it can't be EGA. Reason: It looks like pins #1 and 2 are tied to ground, and pins 6-7 are tied together. Pin #2 is defined as a second ground on MDA and CGA, but is one of the color lines for EGA running in the 350 line mode, which rules out driving an EGA monitor. Meanwhile, tying 6 and 7 together would make sense if you wanted to use an MDA monitor to display only 1-bit video at the high-intensity brightness. The only question remaining would be why they bothered wiring the CGA color lines (3 through 5) if it's only a monochrome card that wouldn't likely support a 200 line video mode. Perhaps they're there for multisync TTL monitors expecting 3 or 4 line RGB (and they're all actually tied together on the host card) (*), or perhaps there's some other type of monitor supported by that port that uses those pins. (Always a possibility) But, yes, the one thing we can definitively say is it's not EGA.In the meantime, the pinout/traces are pretty clear in the enlarged section of the listing pic in the second post.
(*) Edit: This conjecture is actually supported by the pinouts on that document NJRoadFan attached, IE, look at the "Pin assignments for other computers" section, 8 and 16 color TTL modes.
Last edited by a moderator:


















