• Hello MLAers! We've re-enabled auto-approval for accounts. If you are still waiting on account approval, please check this thread for more information.

Snow Leopard and Classic Mac OS

Hey guys, I have some bad news. I just upgraded to Snow Leopard today, and the Classic Mac OS can no longer connect or share to it. I'm using a fully updated Mac OS 9 Mac, and I get an incompatible AFP error message. And yes, I'm using IP, not Appletalk.

Looks like the last vestige of AppleShare and Pre-OS X has been eliminated.

 
I don't really get this (which is no big surprise)... aren't filesharing protocols essentially standards? Isn't this a bit like breaking ftp or http?

Someone please explain...

 
Darn, I was just getting ready to set up a network with my SE/30, Orange iMac, and Macbook...

Guess I'll have to stick to the old floppies and zip disks then. :(

 
Pretty sure I recall reading that Apple ditched Appletalk in 10.6. I might be mistaken though.

As I stated, I was connecting via AppleShare with IP, not AppleTalk.

AppleTalk was still around in 10.4 and 10.5, but just for printers. 10.5 worked just fine with Classic Macs and AppleShare over TCP/IP. 10.6 it's broken.

 
aren't filesharing protocols essentially standards? Isn't this a bit like breaking ftp or http?
The difference is that ftp and http are international standards and not tied to any one vendor. The AppleTalk protocols are all, funnily enough, defined by Apple.

 
Yes but have you tried these steps to success?
And further reading on the TCPquantum hack as used in my steps.

Tried it, but it doesn't work. I can add the line to the Pref file, and save it just fine with File Sharing off. After I try and fail to connect with the OS 9 Mac, the line is no longer in the pref file.

It looks like your hack was more of a 10.4 solution. 10.6 is very different.

It appears that the client will have to have AFP 3.0 or higher, which means Mac OS X. OS 9 introduced AFP 2.2, and it's not cutting it anymore.

 
The difference is that ftp and http are international standards and not tied to any one vendor. The AppleTalk protocols are all, funnily enough, defined by Apple.
Well, I get that part... just wondering if there's actually a pragmatic reason for breaking it (like they need the ports for something else) or if it's just a matter of forcing hardware upgrades.

 
The difference is that ftp and http are international standards and not tied to any one vendor. The AppleTalk protocols are all, funnily enough, defined by Apple.
Well, I get that part... just wondering if there's actually a pragmatic reason for breaking it (like they need the ports for something else) or if it's just a matter of forcing hardware upgrades.

AFP (AppleShare) has evolved many times over the years, where FTP has been a "Gold" standard for decades. AFP originally shared using AppleTalk, then a mixture of AppleTalk and IP, and finally just IP. Even there, when Mac OS X came out, they continued to evolve it to version 3.0. Apparently, that version (3.0) is required now to share files. Mac OS 9 only went up to AFP 2.2.

I think the main reason for this is less to test for Apple. In reality, most people who care about this stuff are Classic Apple nerds like us. :)

I don't think Apple's trying to force Mac OS 9 users to upgrade. If you're still using Mac OS 9, Apple has long since given up on trying to upgrade you. :)

 
What about this method? It requires an intermediary, so I guess now, the intermediary has to be an 10.5.x or less?
Hey, I wrote that article! LOL!

That was more related to getting really old Macs talking to Leopard, but now all Classic Macs are shut off!

Snow Leopard can share using FTP, which means you could share back to a Mac Plus easily with Fetch.

One cool thing about sharing with FTP is that it "Shares a Share" unlike AppleShare. In other words, all mounted drives, including network drives, are available to the FTP client. That is really cool. Imagine a Mac Plus pulling directly from an iDisk or other share it couldn't natively get to.

The downside of FTP is it's not disk/GUI based sharing. You can't mount and run apps off of it like AppleShare.

 
The downside of FTP...
Right now, I can use my G4 Cube running Tiger and my SE/30 running System 7.5.5 to talk to each other over Ethernet (via the TCPquantum hack), and I can simply drag one of my SE/30's hard disk partitions over to the Cube's hard drive to make a full backup of it. It's relative fast and easy, and all the System files copy over just fine. I never was able to accomplish that with FTP.

 
No reason as to why it wouldn't - USB floppy drives use the standard USB Mass Storage drivers.

 
In a pinch, Snow Leopard still supports 1.44 megabyte USB floppy drives. Just thought I'd mention it.
Is it that OS X .6 specifically supports 1.44MB floppy disk drives, or that it supports USB removable FAT volumes, of any size? I would think the USB drive itself would be responsible for the MFM encoding scheme, leaving it to send/receive the FAT file formatting via USB. As long as OS X understands FAT and allows 1.44MB volumes to be read and written, I can't imagine any Mac OS would ever omit the USB floppy disk – and I don't see FAT being eliminated anytime soon. This goes for any USB device. It's like asking how much longer will Apple support HFS, which can no longer be used as a startup disk?

Unfortunately, Apple dumped MFS with OS 8, and never fully revived it. Even MFSLives runs only on Tiger. I really wish someone would update MFSLives for Leopard as well as enabling read & write capabilities. Then if someone would only develop that USB GCR floppy drive!

 
Leo Laporte, The Tech Guy, stated on this past weekend's episode that OSX code named "Snow Leopard" is the watershed for PowerPC-based Macs. It is the only version that you'll need an Intel Mac to run. This also includes dropping AppleTalk, as it is old and outdated.

73s de Phreakout. 8-)

 
Back
Top