None of the minis had G5s. They went straight from G4s to Intel chips.g4 mac mini? i thought the first ever mac minis had a g5 processor.btw, i have (or will have, at least) a g4 quicksilver but that is way slower than the emac.
None of the minis had G5s. They went straight from G4s to Intel chips.g4 mac mini? i thought the first ever mac minis had a g5 processor.btw, i have (or will have, at least) a g4 quicksilver but that is way slower than the emac.
If you have a Quicksilver, you can upgrade the CPU. Apple made them with up to a dual 1.0ghz and aftermarket upgrades go even further than that and you have expansion slots. The eMac is pretty much a closed system with limited expandability. eMacs also have problems with video failing over time just like the original iMacs. You are better off to upgrade the Quicksilver than buy an eMac.g4 mac mini? i thought the first ever mac minis had a g5 processor.btw, i have (or will have, at least) a g4 quicksilver but that is way slower than the emac.
do you happen to know where to get some updated cpus in europe? the g5 will be sold soon, so i really need a powerful g4. btw it is insanely great to run os 9 again natively..If you have a Quicksilver, you can upgrade the CPU. Apple made them with up to a dual 1.0ghz and aftermarket upgrades go even further than that and you have expansion slots. The eMac is pretty much a closed system with limited expandability. eMacs also have problems with video failing over time just like the original iMacs. You are better off to upgrade the Quicksilver than buy an eMac.g4 mac mini? i thought the first ever mac minis had a g5 processor.btw, i have (or will have, at least) a g4 quicksilver but that is way slower than the emac.
Try ebay. I know things are harder and more expensive to get in Europe, so try to find a USA seller willing to ship. It will cost less.do you happen to know where to get some updated cpus in europe? the g5 will be sold soon, so i really need a powerful g4. btw it is insanely great to run os 9 again natively..If you have a Quicksilver, you can upgrade the CPU. Apple made them with up to a dual 1.0ghz and aftermarket upgrades go even further than that and you have expansion slots. The eMac is pretty much a closed system with limited expandability. eMacs also have problems with video failing over time just like the original iMacs. You are better off to upgrade the Quicksilver than buy an eMac.g4 mac mini? i thought the first ever mac minis had a g5 processor.btw, i have (or will have, at least) a g4 quicksilver but that is way slower than the emac.
that boils down to $643 USDhttp://www.macstuff.nl/product_info.php?cPath=21_78_446&products_id=5566ignore the dutch ( dutch ! not german ) and look at the price
446 for a dual 1.7 ghz G4 processor upgrade
...right how much was a mini again ?
That's because the 7447 has no level 3 cache. The 7455 has up to 2mb per CPU. In Photoshop or other apps that are cache intensive it makes a big difference.that boils down to $643 USDhttp://www.macstuff.nl/product_info.php?cPath=21_78_446&products_id=5566ignore the dutch ( dutch ! not german ) and look at the price
446 for a dual 1.7 ghz G4 processor upgrade
...right how much was a mini again ?
that is for the 7447 model G4.
there is a dual 7455 1.4ghz upgrade for $419 USD at fastmac, its known to some that a single 7455 1.4ghz G4 can keep with (and sometimes surpass) a single 7447 at 1.8ghz.
I mirror that sentiment, and point out the performance benefits of using a current low-end Mac Mini over all PowerMac G5s ever. The only thing it can't do is hold 16 gigs of ram, and it doesn't have great graphics, but the graphics are fine, and many people are quick to point out that you don't "need" more than 2 or 4 gigs of ram in most computers.either way its an enormous wad of cash for just an cpu upgrade in an old machine