-
Hello Guest! We're hosting a challenge to welcome vintage Intel macs to the MLA during the month of July! See this thread for more information. -
We've made some quality of life improvements to the Trading Post. More info here.
Fun Apple article pitting an SE/30 against a Mac IIfx
- Thread starter Huxley
- Start date
Wow, cool cards. I thaught the Transwarp was PDS but guess not, that explains why it was slow as hell in the Macworld article I have.
I would love that Data Cannon for the IIfx (SCSI card).
I have a bunch of cool cards, but there is still so much out there to get.
Is there any chance you can get a copy of that programmable chip for the Tokamac II Fx?
I would love that Data Cannon for the IIfx (SCSI card).
I have a bunch of cool cards, but there is still so much out there to get.
Is there any chance you can get a copy of that programmable chip for the Tokamac II Fx?
TylerEss
＞That's interesting that the TransWarp 040 is a NuBus card... does it have similar compatibility problems as the Radius Rocket?
Because Transwarp doesn't have the driver software, details are uncertain. [xx(] ]'>
It was being written that TransWarp 040 was slow also in the magazine at hand.
In Data Cannon, it is easy to treat, and I am one of the favorite cards. [
] ]'>
There is no thing that increases any further because I am not collecting cards now.
I think that it cannot copy a programmable chip of Tokamac though it is regrettable. [V]
＞That's interesting that the TransWarp 040 is a NuBus card... does it have similar compatibility problems as the Radius Rocket?
Because Transwarp doesn't have the driver software, details are uncertain. [xx(] ]'>
It was being written that TransWarp 040 was slow also in the magazine at hand.
In Data Cannon, it is easy to treat, and I am one of the favorite cards. [
] ]'>There is no thing that increases any further because I am not collecting cards now.
I think that it cannot copy a programmable chip of Tokamac though it is regrettable. [V]
Similar threads
