I was just watching my 1985 10" Sony Trinitron TV, realizing it was going to be obsolete soon when the US goes digital. When I realized it is about the same size and shape as my Mac Plus. I felt the top of it and sure enough it was pretty darn warm. At least as warm as my Plus.
So that got me thinking. This little TV has been in constant use for almost 23 years, many more hours than my Mac Plus ever saw. And, it has never needed a single repair!
Does the Mac Plus run that much hotter than this little TV? Or was the original design so underpowered that it was not as robust as even my little TV? Why were the failure rates of the early compacts analogue boards so much higher than that of a similarly constructed TV? The venting scheme is about the same. A quick hand test confirms that after several hours the TV and Mac Plus feels about the same temperature from the top vent.
So did Apple really fail to design the compact up to the standards of television sets of the day, or does the logic-board add significantly to power consumption and heat production over a TV set, which could not be adequately compensated for in such a compact design?
So that got me thinking. This little TV has been in constant use for almost 23 years, many more hours than my Mac Plus ever saw. And, it has never needed a single repair!
Does the Mac Plus run that much hotter than this little TV? Or was the original design so underpowered that it was not as robust as even my little TV? Why were the failure rates of the early compacts analogue boards so much higher than that of a similarly constructed TV? The venting scheme is about the same. A quick hand test confirms that after several hours the TV and Mac Plus feels about the same temperature from the top vent.
So did Apple really fail to design the compact up to the standards of television sets of the day, or does the logic-board add significantly to power consumption and heat production over a TV set, which could not be adequately compensated for in such a compact design?


