ahh, so you're the one who grabbed that... i was eyeing it but it was a tad too pricy. glad it ended up in a good placeThis card was listed on JDirectItems and Mercari for a while, but I couldn't justify the price:
ahh, so you're the one who grabbed that... i was eyeing it but it was a tad too pricy. glad it ended up in a good placeThis card was listed on JDirectItems and Mercari for a while, but I couldn't justify the price:
Interesting insights, thanks joevt!The TALKs ROM seems to have differences between itself and the Mathey card that don't exist in the XRack card.
Thanks. You may have noticed that a few of the Kuroutoshikou SATA cards have gone missing as well.ahh, so you're the one who grabbed that... i was eyeing it but it was a tad too pricy. glad it ended up in a good place![]()
It provides the 2.5V core voltage for the controller chip. The cheaper cards just use a big diode in series with the 3.3V regulator. 3.3V - 0.7V = 2.6V; close enough, eh!Anyone has an idea what the second, adjustable LDO voltage regulator is for?
Ah I see it now, interesting. I have a few cards on the way to experiment with. I'd like to benchmark and compare the VT6421A with the SIL3112 cards.It provides the 2.5V core voltage for the controller chip. The cheaper cards just use a big diode in series with the 3.3V regulator. 3.3V - 0.7V = 2.6V; close enough, eh!
Some card designs use a 2.5V fixed LDO instead of the adjustable regulator.
Great! Glad to hear you're going to try it for yourself. I would love to see some benchmarks. I did a back-to-back QuickBench with a SIL3112 and the VT6421A just as a quick sanity check. Performance looked about the same, but I was only using a 500GB Hitachi HDD. I don't have any spare SATA devices fast enough to let either card really stretch its legs.Ah I see it now, interesting. I have a few cards on the way to experiment with. I'd like to benchmark and compare the VT6421A with the SIL3112 cards.
Did you encounter any sleep related issues, or is the AMS1117 3.3V LDO only problematic with the SIL3112?
Strange. Although I would expect the sleep/wake issue to manifest if the OS was booted from a disk handled by this controller.The card works fine in the 5400 running 8.6, and it sleeps/wakes reliably, but the machine doesn't seem to want to boot from a drive connected to the card, which is a bummer.
It mainly depends on the controller on the drive I think. Some had to be forced, some was compatible with the older protocol by default.Do these cards have compatibility with newer SATA 300 and 600 devices? I know back in the day these VIA6421 cards hated newer drives and you have to force the drive to 150Mbit mode (via jumper) for it to work on these cards. Later SATA drives dropped the SATA-150 mode jumpers and won't work at all with this chip in many cases.