• Updated 2023-07-12: Hello, Guest! Welcome back, and be sure to check out this follow-up post about our outage a week or so ago.

haplain's never-ending quest

haplain

Well-known member
Yeah, I kind of wish they had come out with something like that. It would have been awful to keep clean and not scuff though.

I had a drive but it failed and I wasn't able to recover anything off of it sadly. My buddies seeing if he can dig out some disks for it. We will eventually get it sorted out, until then I'll continue my quest for more stuff!

 

haplain

Well-known member
Yeah it was no good but I'll figure it out. It always makes it sweeter when I get it working after some serious stress. Thus far my track records good so I remain hopeful. Does anyone think that maybe trying to install 9.2.2 would help to get it working? I'd be okay running 9.2.2-10.5 if I knew which one would work. I haven't tried 10.5 yet.

 

TheMacGuy

Well-known member
Well, the 5,8 that shipped didn't support a native boot of OS 9, so its safe to assume the PBG4DP Proto is the same.

 

Gorgonops

Moderator
Staff member
Maybe a 10.0 public beta or 10.0 standard would work
Are you talking about this on the dual CPU prototype? I rather doubt it. If there's one consistent rule about Macs it's that they *never* boot OS releases older than themselves and if the dual CPU unit is really in the "5,8" family it probably won't boot anything less than 10.4.something. (Another possibility is the 5,8 designation was reused and simply means "successor to 5,7", but that would still make the oldest OS at all likely to run on it a late version of 10.3.) Are you booting it with a "Retail" 10.4 disk, and if so, does it attempt to install or does it complain the system is unsupported? I'd hazard that cloning a working 10.4 install from another machine is probably your best shot at making it go, but if that's not working, I dunno, maybe Leopard?

(I have to wonder if the 5,8 designation, since that applies to the shipped 1.67 high-def screen model, might be causing the system to load the wrong set of kernel modules for a dual CPU or some other hardware element. It might be interesting to try a PPC Linux disk on it and see what happens.)

 

haplain

Well-known member
Ok well maybe I'll try 10.5 and see if that gets me anything.

Any chance I could somehow test/remove the 5,8 designation?

 

TheMacGuy

Well-known member
It has to do with the OS. By the model identifier, it loads up the proper drivers. Since the 5,8 shipped without a DP, it can't load the proper drivers with a standard OS. Thats my guess.

 

uniserver

Well-known member
maybe you could frame it.. and your GF will let you have it in the living room…

or maybe you can put it on the ceiling in your bed room :)

LOL

 

unity

Well-known member
6500 is where it started. Didn't pay that and will maybe use it for a trade.
Okay, I thought it was more but the auction I found was $4k. Crazy. No matter the start price, I think you made out really well on that one!

 

CC_333

Well-known member
If I'm not mistaken, that looks like a MacBook Pro of some sort with a DVT prototype wireless card.

Based on the limited evidence, it appears to be otherwise production or very late pre-production, unless you all know something I don't?

c

 

haplain

Well-known member
Yeah it's some kind of late stage DVT model. I'd assume the wireless chip was what was being evaluated. Also the fact the board is not the standard logic board color for that machine is another indication it's not a production model. Lastly the EMC number being XXXX means it was a test unit. Overall I'm happy with the purchase and think it was worthwhile. It's hard to find newer DVT units like this. After the iPhone 4 was "lost" Apple really got crazy about everything. This was the model before that loss but one I doubt we see many prototype things from 2010 on.

 
Top