Search results

@cheesestraws Awesome! I have to pull my SE down from the shelf and will report back. It might be a couple of days though. Thanks for this!

And the conclusions (all on my multipacket Daynaport firmware): 1) Either the Daynaport driver or the ENC doesn't like an old-fashioned 10 BASE-T hub. Plugging into my Wifi access point (gigabit switch) allowed the IIsi to work fine on AppleShare. 2) The IIsi itself kind of sucks. While...

So I pulled my IIsi out and plugged in the Scuznet with my current Daynaport firmware and, completely surprising to me, I ran into problems: (Note that I booted off the Scuznet, so same System Folder that is working fine on my SE, SE/30 and PB 145B). My IIsi only had 5MB of memory so I started...

So I pulled out my That’s correct for a Mac that supports OT but Macs without enough RAM or without an 030 switch to Classic networking, even if OT is selected.

I should re-benchmark with Classic networking on my SE/30. I should have noted that I was running Classic networking on my SE when I was testing it earlier - OT requires an 030. (I was actually a bit surprised, booting the same 7.5.3 image which is normally Open Transport automatically...

Thanks @saybur - Those results are interesting - network setup must play a pretty significant role - Your software setup seems to mirror what I had suggested before maybe with the exception of not updating your Open Transport to 1.3 - 68k custom install. (I am assuming you're running Open...

Good question on whether or not it would keep restarting! I actually pulled the extension out before I could try it again so I don't know what would have happened if I left it in. Fully agree that a CPU check would be good enough. I would think that anything that's on a 68000 could be safe to...

@cheesestraws - Force32 is awesome and saves a fair bit of time fiddling around with PRAM-battery-less Macs. I know the Github page indicates that the extension doesn't check for 32-bit addressing capability but it would be awesome if if would check the gestalt ID and not do it's magic if it's...

Interesting... I assumed Fetch estimates of kB per second would be accurate but a point in time estimate. i.e. it shows the current rate of transfer but not the average speed to the current point in time. I will try the stop watch test on the 6mb test file I use for AppleShare. For the dma...

That is still a bit odd though. Once the Nuvolink connects successfully reconnects to the Mac, I think it keeps sending packets until it gets asked to disconnect so you’d think it would be able to keep up. I am also pretty sure I was getting around 50kbs on Appleshare with Nuvolink before on my...

Something seems weird there. I am not seeing any real speed differences on the forked Scuznet Daynaport firmware I posted earlier between AppleTalk and FTP and I haven’t messed with the buffer space at all. I am also not seeing any retransmits. I have tested on an SE30 and pb145b. It might be...

I think you had mentioned before that you weren't too keen on it but the killer v 2.1 feature for me, assuming somebody can come up with a 2.5" powerbook size scuznet, is a Scuznet that includes the IDC50 and DB25 options, and a 2 prong header for a secondary power input. I wouldn't be...

Before the recent posts on the prior thread were lost, Saybur promised the version 2.1 board would incorporate an 68040 class accelerator and, if the ATXmega you select has enough RAM, some limited ability to travel through time. So not a bad idea to wait!

I haven't really used KiCad either (other than for following Scuznet schematics when troubleshooting). If I had more time, I would press ahead with exactly what you're proposing (similar to what I had proposed before "the event" - a Scuznet with a 2.5" HD footprint and ideally a header that...

For some additional upside, the hang I was getting at shutdown when just running a TCP app without an AppleShare volume mounted seems to be gone as well.

I added a new branch for the Daynaport emulation at https://github.com/superjer2000/scuznet/tree/Daynaport---Multipacket If anybody else can test, I'd appreciate it. As noted previously, I am getting about 75k/s on my SE/30 and about 100k/s on my PB145b with AppleShare, and about the same with...

For clarity, this question is in relation to disk performance, not network performance.

One other point for project documentation - As noted I've been working to optimize the Daynaport emulation and have been able to make some pretty significant improvements on AppleTalk performance. * I had made my original changes on the scuznet.ini version of the base firmware (the version...

Rewind my prior comment on me running FTP on Debian. It's amazing how all of these various projects start to blend into one big blob in my mind after a while. That was my prior setup when I had my netatalk server running on a raspberry pi. IIRC, the default FTP daemon with Debian only...

You are getting 100k+ on Appletalk but only 30k on FTP? That is really weird. From the work I have done, FTP has almost always been faster - I assumed due to less overhead for tcp than appletalk. Are you running OpenTransport? While I am getting about 76kbs on appletalk on my SE30 now I am...