Like others have said earlier what's the point of such a niche network for one specific brand of old computer?
I'm not saying you shouldn't go for it but I wouldn't bother. At least you'll learn something
I don't understand what would make this different from any other indie WWW construct. You point to tailspins caused by a lack of "content" but don't elaborate what makes your proposal stand apart and where you're gonna get free content. If I really want "an ad-and-AI-free, curated, small" social...
The term "walled-garden" was an immediate turn off for me
I think the only useful sect of this scheme would be multiplayer games, you could do everything else on a Unixen box with the Macintosh just acting as a terminal.
Never use glue to attach components to the PCB.
Your joints look wrinkly, next time actually use flux and more heat on the iron. A good solder joint is smooth and shiny.
If you were on Linux you could mount the plain old HFS disk images natively and list the files.
In my opinion I would publish the magnetic flux copies of the diskettes along with Disk Copy images so everyone has everything they would ever need
2716 ROMs are supported by the Relatively Universal ROM Programmer, but you don't actually need it if you only want to read out a ROM.
A plain microcontroller can be used. See https://www.nycresistor.com/2012/07/07/stick-a-straw-in-its-brain-and-suck-how-to-read-a-rom/
So, I watched Action Retro's video where he installs a Performer in a Plus.
It doesn't play nice with his BlueSCSI. Has anyone else experienced problems when using the Performer in a Plus?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.