Search results

As best as I have observed, the slowness is the data rate.

I've been wanting to do something similar with these instructions. http://www.dataswamp.net/apple2eserialterm/ Keep us posted on how it goes. :approve: (There is an Apple ][ smiley floating around here somewhere that should be added to the smiley list. *cough*cough*)

WOW, They have the 48MB Duo modules for $50. Thanks for the link! [:D] ]'>

Awesome, thanks protocol7! I'll keep this in mind when I get 8.6 back up on the B&W or 2300c.

Most likely, Yes. So, both CPUs (with their matching RAM) work fine in at least one of the WSs. I think this rules out a RAM or CPU issue, Yes? My instinct is saying you may have more than one issue. Maybe a bad HDD or both, or a bad LB and a bad HDD. I'm kind of stabbing in the dark at this...

I was looking for this a few months ago. I never found it...

I'm beginning to lean on bad Main Board in your "bad" WS. Try the 266 CPU in the "bad" and see what happens. Again, I've never had anything remotely similar, my WS has always been rock solid, a bit RAM picky, but solid. Hmmm... Wait a second... Your RAM is compatible, right?

Can you test your memory chips?

Please note: This will likely leave you unable to boot from CD.

Is it possible to simply turn the PSU fan around? I've done this with some CPU fans in the past to surprisingly stunning results.

My QS '02 went through two PSU and then I gave up. Is there a common failing point in these, or is it a general poor design?

Nope, it was just a thought... that if possible, would likely have already been done.

This is something that I always wondered if it would work. The Quad 2.5 is a machine with two CPUs that each have two cores, Yes? The Dual 2.7 is a machine with one CPU that has two cores, Yes? Would it be possible to take two of the Dual 2.7 modules and replace those in the Quad 2.5 to make...

Bump* Anyone find anything new on this?

TenFourFox* Camino *courtesy of ClassicHasClass MintPPC Head over to the forums if you have an issue installing and JD or I will be glad to help you out.

http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/Processors.html That is one of the best resources I've seen on these things. While switching from one model up or down is sometimes possible, going from the top 167 to the bottom is going to be no go.

That was in reference to using higher capacity cells that the duo may not be able charge internally. This was to avoid a memory effect from the batteries only getting partially charged. However, you pointed out that only NiCD have this issue, not NiMH, making this point no longer relevant.

Stress test the drive a bit from Lion. You said you are confident it is good... which means if it is bad it won't get tested, so lets take care of the obvious "confident it isn't" problems. You are likely right, I've never had a bad OWC drive, but lets make sure.

Mine has never been flaky. (Stable under OS 9 & Debian, never used X on mine.) I'm going to guess it is the CPU card for the moment. Upgrades such as that are best removed and the machine returned to stock when checking other parts and then returned when all extensions and everything can be...

Would this help? Or is it the one you already found?