Recent content by Callan

Awesome for sure!!! Thanks for the detailed write up! It's definitely on the to-do list now!

I've saved a lot of tubes with a tube rejuvenator. Some have nearly perfect guns when your done, some don't. It all depends on how 'hard' you have to hit them to clean them (i.e., how bad they are). I will say this... Older tubes are better candidates for rejuvenating. They made electron guns...

I can look at my spare chassis a little later and make you a list. There are quite a few caps in the neckboard as well. I ended up replacing them, but I didn't see any bad. Also... It's not a job for the meek. I had to pull one of the 90-degree pcbs to cap it. It was an absolute dog to...

I just got done rebuilding one. Picked one up at vcfwest off the free pile. I recapped it, but had to spend some time finding a new flyback for it. I was able to find a complete chassis on eBay, so I have 2 chassis now. Both chassis had bad caps in the smps supply, so that could be part of...

I was looking over the results in the github and noticed you needed to verify readings with the new code on a number of machines. I have a number of the machines on that list. Would you like me to retest them for you? And if so which version of Asc would you like me to use?

Thats a pretty good looking donor board. I'd bet you can save everything on it (even the fpu). I'd replace the 258's and the 161's just for peace of mind. A new rom socket, a processor socket, new caps, and Bob's your uncle! The caveat being... it's a lot easier to use new parts since the...

Naw! Any time you need a test, I'm down to help. Any reason to turn a Mac on is a good reason. 😁 Asc version 6 (se/30 version). 4 runs.

Here are 4 tests with the new app (se/30 ver 3).

Original version 3 (non se/30 specific) reports (multiple runs) (1 1),(1,1),(0 0) (5 5), 1 (1 1),(1,1),(0 0) (2 2), 1 (1 1),(2,1),(0 0) (4 4), 1 (1 1),(1,1),(0 0) (2 2), 1 (1 1),(1,1),(0 0) (4 4), 1 (1 1),(1,1),(0 0) (3 3), 1 And another wrench... (2 2),(1,1),(0 0) (1 1), 1 (Was moving the mouse...

Nope... I read the your description and somehow missed the start of the paragraph (sigh). Here are a couple with the new one. I've run it over 15 times now and the fifo is staying the same.

Is that not the new one I'm running? Did you update the code with a new one?

Yeah... I was looking for a way to duplicate it, but it seems random. Ran the test 3 times and got 1000 on fifo. Ran it one more time and got 1010.

Update. I ran it again and i got a different fifo result (machine had sat off for a while). Restarted and it's back to 1000 on the fifo again.

Here is the new code ran on the same se/30. Ran it multiple times. Attached 3 of the instances.

Leave it to me to throw a wrench in the works again. It seems to be my forte´.