colopick
Member
Hello everyone,
I’m currently working on recapping SE/30 logic boards.
As we know, these were originally fitted with SMD electrolytic capacitors, many of which are now leaking, corroded, or electrically unstable.
My goal is to find a long-term reliable replacement solution that stays as close as possible to the original circuit characteristics while also being conservation-friendly – meaning components that will not leak, dry out, or introduce an increased risk of thermal failure.
Since the choice of replacement capacitor type can affect the behavior of the SE/30, I’m interested in how others approach this.
Possible Replacement Types:
1) MLCC (Multilayer Ceramic, e.g., X7R/X5R)
+ Will not leak and has no traditional end-of-life drying issues
+ Excellent high-frequency characteristics
+ Compact SMD sizes
- Capacitance loss under DC bias (especially in higher µF ranges)
- Very low ESR can alter damping and power rail behavior
- Slight logarithmic aging of capacitance over time
2) Tantalum Capacitors
+ Capacitance remains stable over temperature and time
+ Often closer to the original analog behavior of the circuit
+ No electrolyte to dry out
- Polarized → reverse installation results in failure
- Can fail short / go thermal in fault conditions
- Recommended to use generous voltage derating (often 2× the operating voltage)
3) Conductive Polymer Capacitors (e.g., OS-CON, SP-Cap)
+ Very stable capacitance and ESR over the entire lifetime
+ No leakage / no drying out
+ Safe failure mode (non-flammable)
- Larger than MLCCs
- Higher cost
Discussion Points:
• Do you prefer Tantalum, MLCC, or Polymer — and why?
• Are there long-term (>5 years) experience reports with any of these solutions?
• Have you noticed differences in system behavior?
• If MLCCs are used:
- What voltage derating and package sizes have proven reliable?
I'm very interested in hearing your experiences and observations.
Thanks and best regards!
I’m currently working on recapping SE/30 logic boards.
As we know, these were originally fitted with SMD electrolytic capacitors, many of which are now leaking, corroded, or electrically unstable.
My goal is to find a long-term reliable replacement solution that stays as close as possible to the original circuit characteristics while also being conservation-friendly – meaning components that will not leak, dry out, or introduce an increased risk of thermal failure.
Since the choice of replacement capacitor type can affect the behavior of the SE/30, I’m interested in how others approach this.
Possible Replacement Types:
1) MLCC (Multilayer Ceramic, e.g., X7R/X5R)
+ Will not leak and has no traditional end-of-life drying issues
+ Excellent high-frequency characteristics
+ Compact SMD sizes
- Capacitance loss under DC bias (especially in higher µF ranges)
- Very low ESR can alter damping and power rail behavior
- Slight logarithmic aging of capacitance over time
2) Tantalum Capacitors
+ Capacitance remains stable over temperature and time
+ Often closer to the original analog behavior of the circuit
+ No electrolyte to dry out
- Polarized → reverse installation results in failure
- Can fail short / go thermal in fault conditions
- Recommended to use generous voltage derating (often 2× the operating voltage)
3) Conductive Polymer Capacitors (e.g., OS-CON, SP-Cap)
+ Very stable capacitance and ESR over the entire lifetime
+ No leakage / no drying out
+ Safe failure mode (non-flammable)
- Larger than MLCCs
- Higher cost
Discussion Points:
• Do you prefer Tantalum, MLCC, or Polymer — and why?
• Are there long-term (>5 years) experience reports with any of these solutions?
• Have you noticed differences in system behavior?
• If MLCCs are used:
- What voltage derating and package sizes have proven reliable?
I'm very interested in hearing your experiences and observations.
Thanks and best regards!