We absolutely must verify that uniserver's no longer paying royalties under agreement with the document's creators before proceeding with such an effort.
I've bought the paper versions from Bomarc in the past in order to "legitimize" illegal electronic copies I've harvested from the web. Intellectual property rights are a serious issue and rights to it belong to the company's ownership even after the doors of a business have closed.
If anyone learns of a process to reimburse the creators for the illegal copies floating around, I'd appreciate the opportunity to divest myself of a bit more of teh filthy lucre.
Be that as it may: "fair use" of intellectual property includes artistic and educational purposes. Such is a sticky wicket legally. Consolidation of information from multiple sources even more so, but that's a time honored and legitimate tradition known as primary source research.
There are definitely gaps in Apple's "in-process" engineering schematic for the SE/30 and in its official documentation publications, specifically in the IIsi information in DCaDftMF. Error corrections and additional information almost certainly exist in later "unreleased" iterations of Apple's SE/30 schematic and errors in Bomarc's schematics should be expected.
For this particular project I'd say have at it, needs to be done and is arguably legitimate use.
All IMO, of course.
edit: note that my opinion here is based information garnered by personal experiences in the process of spending several thousand dollars on legal advice for very similar and in cases identical issues.