.....Maybe stuff like that could go in a 68kmla.org/wiki/Articles/The_name_of_the_page with /wiki/Articles being an index?I will volunteer to write descriptions of educational software programs for 68K Macs, including how they can be used in a modern setting and can meet the educational focus of today's schools (i.e. relating OutNumbered to the current goals of NCTM).
Certainly there are a lot of areas that could be improved. Feel free to make any changes you like!I think it is very disorganized and hard to find many things of value (sorry but I do). Does anyone else feel this way? :?:
MediaWiki, the software that is developed for Wikipedia, etc.What do you use for the Wiki software anyway?
Generally speaking, we shouldn't have subpages in the main namespace. Don't embed categorization/hierarchy into the name. For example, we have a [wiki]Tutorials[/wiki] page for an index, and a [wiki]Category:Tutorials[/wiki] to organize everything under. We also have [wiki]Category:Software[/wiki] for factual articles about the software and [wiki]Category:Essays[/wiki] for whatever other Mac-related ramblings you might want to write.Maybe stuff like that could go in a 68kmla.org/wiki/Articles/The_name_of_the_page with /wiki/Articles being an index?
Everything is categorized fairly logically, naming is straightforward, we try to have index pages where relevant. What do you find disorganized? I'll admit a certain bias as I've been heavily involved in the current wiki organization, but I'd really like to know what we can do to make it better.I don't like the layout of the wiki very much. I think it is very disorganized and hard to find many things of value (sorry but I do). Does anyone else feel this way? :?:
I think that this role has already been given to the 68k MLA wiki. Why do we need to second one? If you're interesting in writing about vintage Mac's, then I suggest you add to the current 68k MLA wiki.What if there was a wiki about old macs where we combined Jag's House, Gamba, and others links into one place to make finding info easier? It would be similar to the 68kMLA wiki but with links to projects, rare items, etc...
What do you think?
You're the second person to say the wiki is confusing, but I have yet to hear any specifics. So I'll repeat myself...I think this is a AWESOME IDEA :approve: ! We could replace the confusing 68kmla wiki with it!
If you have any specific issues, get involved and try to resolve them. We're open to extra help and new ideas.Everything is categorized fairly logically, naming is straightforward, we try to have index pages where relevant. What do you find disorganized? I'll admit a certain bias as I've been heavily involved in the current wiki organization, but I'd really like to know what we can do to make it better.