• Updated 2023-07-12: Hello, Guest! Welcome back, and be sure to check out this follow-up post about our outage a week or so ago.

LC475 memory issue(?)

Ajediday

Member
I am trying to bring a LC475 back to life, soaked it in iso for a few hours, cleaned it up, and recapped it. When it powers up I get the start up chime, then the chimes of death (long version). Based on what I have read, that should point me to a memory issue. I get the same results with nothing plugged into the board other than power and speaker. It does have a fresh battery. With the video memory installed, same results. Since I only have the on-board memory, I started to look there, checked voltages on the ram, there were two that were not showing 5 volts, both were around .5 to .7. Any ideas on where I should look next?

One strange thing I noticed on this machine, on the modem port, the port instead of being 8 pin (3/3/2) is 9 pin (3/4/2) never seen that before. Is that common and why?

Thank you.
 

Nixontheknight

Well-known member
I am trying to bring a LC475 back to life, soaked it in iso for a few hours, cleaned it up, and recapped it. When it powers up I get the start up chime, then the chimes of death (long version). Based on what I have read, that should point me to a memory issue. I get the same results with nothing plugged into the board other than power and speaker. It does have a fresh battery. With the video memory installed, same results. Since I only have the on-board memory, I started to look there, checked voltages on the ram, there were two that were not showing 5 volts, both were around .5 to .7. Any ideas on where I should look next?

One strange thing I noticed on this machine, on the modem port, the port instead of being 8 pin (3/3/2) is 9 pin (3/4/2) never seen that before. Is that common and why?

Thank you.
The modem port is probably geoport. And as for the memory, I’d tone out the connections for the RAM using a multimeter in continuity mode/diode check
 

max1zzz

Well-known member
If you have a hot ari station it may be worth removing the ram IC closest to the right edge of the board as cap goop sometimes pools under it and can eat away the traces /via's under it

Edit: nevermind was thinking of the LC III there, RAM placement on the 475 is totally different.
 

jajan547

Well-known member
Here's an LC III schematic I have while it's obviously a different machine I think the RAM and RAM lines are mostly the same.
 

Attachments

  • Macintosh LC III Schematic (bomarc).pdf
    5.7 MB · Views: 9

Ajediday

Member
After tracing most of the data and address lines, I spotted something a little strange on the memory chip next to the two caps I replaced, I might have found an issue or it just might be another red herringchip.PNG
 

mdeverhart

Well-known member
Cap goo can definitely eat away traces, and those look broken to me. I’d measure continuity between the solder pads and the other end of the suspect traces to be sure. If they are broken, you’ll need to add some bodge wires to bridge the broken traces.
 

Johnnya101

Well-known member
What above said. Or hold the board up with a bright light behind it, and if light shows up there, then they are broken.
 

jajan547

Well-known member
After tracing most of the data and address lines, I spotted something a little strange on the memory chip next to the two caps I replaced, I might have found an issue or it just might be another red herringView attachment 39727
Hey there when those traces attach to pads there is a small dip and it’s likely corrosion has found it’s way into there. I suspect scraping the traces and bridging them to the pads should do the trick.
 

Ajediday

Member
I did try that last night, looked like good connections at that point, still getting death chimes. Went back to the original photos I took of the board before clean up, I'm thinking there's something nasty under that chip at this point. Thinking about removing it, cleaning up under it (the board did get a good soak before this point), and seeing what's going on.475_ram_before.jpeg
 

joshc

Well-known member
This is common on these. Cap goo causes havock with the RAM chips closest to those two caps. It is worth removing the first couple of RAM chips and cleaning under them and cleaning the pins of the chips.
 

jajan547

Well-known member
I did try that last night, looked like good connections at that point, still getting death chimes. Went back to the original photos I took of the board before clean up, I'm thinking there's something nasty under that chip at this point. Thinking about removing it, cleaning up under it (the board did get a good soak before this point), and seeing what's going on.View attachment 39738
I agree gunk likes to hide under chips even on a cleaned board. I’d say remove it and clean it up.
 

jajan547

Well-known member
This is common on these. Cap goo causes havock with the RAM chips closest to those two caps. It is worth removing the first couple of RAM chips and cleaning under them and cleaning the pins of the chips.
Definitely agree with this!
 

Ajediday

Member
It was a mess under there, more of the same thing with the pads, I think I have that taken care of now. Will find out when I put the chip back. In the end this might be a learning experience (I hope not), but fingers are crossed.
 

jajan547

Well-known member
It was a mess under there, more of the same thing with the pads, I think I have that taken care of now. Will find out when I put the chip back. In the end this might be a learning experience (I hope not), but fingers are crossed.
Have any pictures? Interested to see what all was below.
 

Ajediday

Member
I forgot to :( It was the same type of gaps between traces and pads, there wasn't anything really growing under it, the soak I think took care of that, the board was in fairly good condition (with the exception of the gaps).
 

jajan547

Well-known member
I forgot to :( It was the same type of gaps between traces and pads, there wasn't anything really growing under it, the soak I think took care of that, the board was in fairly good condition (with the exception of the gaps).
Working after that?
 
Top