Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

All that power in a laptop? Never…

Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby jruschme » 26 Apr 2012, 18:08

With a little luck, I should be the proud owner of a 12" PowerBook G4 in two weeks. This leaves me with a bit of a quandry.

I currently have a Pismo (500mhz/1gb/40gb) which I use for light duty couch surfing, etc. under Tiger. I also have a Lombard (333mhz/512mb/40gb) which I run as a dedicated Mac OS 9 system for classic games/apps. I'm thinking, though, that it is time to sell/trade/whatever one of them since the 12" will take over the couch surfing and other duties of the Pismo. I figure I have two main choices:

- Keep the Pismo as a dedicated Mac OS 9 machine and dump the Lombard
- Dump the Pismo and keep the Lombard in its current role

It seems like there are advantages and disadvantages to either approach. One one hand, the Pismo has better graphics and is still sought after (particularly the 500mhz CPU). On the other hand, the Lombard has built-in SCSI but, based on what I've seen here, is even hard to give away these days. Either way, I'd keep the better battery and the better optical drive.

So, what advice do the collective brains here have about my quandry?

Thanks...
JR

13" MBP (late 2010), MDD G4/1000x2, Sawtooth G4/800, Pismo G3/500, Lombard G3/333, B&W G4/400
jruschme
 
Joined: 01 Sep 2009, 21:02
Location: Brick, NJ

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby CC_333 » 26 Apr 2012, 18:11

Hi,

Well, probably the Pismo I would keep, since it's faster, has FireWire, and has more RAM. And as you pointed out, they're sought after, and therefore still kind of expensive relative to the Lombard.

To solve the SCSI issue, you could always get an adapter to convert SCSI devices to FireWire.

c
User avatar
CC_333
 
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 05:29
Location: California

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby uniserver » 26 Apr 2012, 18:16

i would keep the lombard, because its a great machine, i think they are more robust then the pismo,(cheap available parts)(if needed) I would sell the pismo because you will get decent money for it, get some windex, shine her up nice and make a decent ad with decent pictures.. and you will get a good solid amount for it.
#I Can Re-Cap Your Board/PSU# (iAmCapsMack@gmail.com) or (maccaps.com) Link---->
Need: 840av, IIfx, *Portable Mainboard, Portable Parts pm-me please*
Fav's: SE/30-FIXD, LC575 Full 040@33mhz /w 1G-HD, IIsi-oc'd-29-mhz, PM 6100-oc'd 90mhz, Color Classic /wLC520 mobo
User avatar
uniserver
 
Joined: 12 Dec 2011, 18:51
Location: Southfield, Mi

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby pistooli » 26 Apr 2012, 18:25

I would keep the Pismo, and put OS9 on it, since it has Airport, firewire (and more RAM).
PowerBook 3400c, 180MHz cpu, 32 MB Ram, 1,3 GB HDD, pcmcia wifi, OS 8.6
PowerBook 5300cs, 100MHz cpu, 16 MB Ram, 2 GB CF, pcmcia wifi, OS 8.6
User avatar
pistooli
 
Joined: 09 Apr 2012, 09:24
Location: Hungary

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby atariangamer » 26 Apr 2012, 18:41

Hmm. I'd say it depends on how much you really need or use that SCSI port. I've got my Pismo that every now and then I've wished it had SCSI for hooking to old drives and what not. If you use it or even forsee using it, keep the Lombard. You're going to like the 12" G4 a whole lot more than the Pismo for just everyday activities (at least, I did while I had one), so if you've got a really great OS 9 machine, keep it like it is.

People do seem to be selling Pismos like crazy, for decent prices. You'll have your OS X and everyday computing covered by the G4, and a very decent classic G3 to cover your classic stuff. And the legacy ports on the Lombard might come in handy, you never know...But if you don't use those legacy ports, the Pismo has the advantage of being a little faster, having more memory, being more connected to your other systems via internet, and being able to do all the features OS 9 has to offer.

If I was in your shoes, I'd keep the Lombard. I'm a very retro person, but I like having something newer and faster as well. The Lombard and the 12" would be a good combo to have.

So that's my two cents.
iMac G3 600mhz, PowerMac G4 GigE DP 500Mhz, TiBook G4 1Ghz, PowerBook Pismo G4 500Mhz, PowerBook 180, MessagePad 2000 (2100 upgrade)
atariangamer
 
Joined: 05 Apr 2012, 19:22

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby Trash80toHP_Mini » 26 Apr 2012, 23:59

I haven't got, and don't really want, a Lombard.

I've got what I think is the best of both worlds, a Wallstreet PDQ with OS9 and a Pismo 500/768 that the craigslister tricked out with a DVD/CD writer that'll play movies automagically when I pop 'em in under 10.4.11 and a MacWireless 802.11g Card that he said was faster than any compatible AirPort Card. Dunno, but it's FAST!!!!

I'd sell the Lombard, Keep the Pismo and look for a deal on a PDQ, that way you'll have SCSI AND ADB. :approve:
jt [8]
Trash Hauler: call sign: eight-ball

C.O. AC130H SpecOps 68kMLAAF
User avatar
Trash80toHP_Mini
NIGHT STALKER
 
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 02:23
Location: Bermuda Triangle, NC, USA

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby jsarchibald » 27 Apr 2012, 00:16

Why not just keep both? They both have unique features and uses, and both are great machines. They take up minimal space, and unless you need the money, there doesn't seem to be any real reason to sell one. I would sit on it and see what you are using over the next 3 months. If you find there is one machine you don't use any more, and have no particular attachment to it, then that is the one that should go. But I'd just hang onto it if it were me.
//e, //c, IIGS, 128K, 512K, 2 x ED, Plus, boxed SE, SE FDHD, SE/30, Portable, CC, Performa 250, boxed LC, boxed Quadra 700, boxed PM6100, TAM x 2, boxed G4 Cube, G4 iMac, TechStep, TC, ATV, 15" Mid-2012 i7 MBP, 27" Thunderbolt Display, iPhone 4S
User avatar
jsarchibald
 
Joined: 06 Oct 2010, 06:48
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby uniserver » 27 Apr 2012, 04:02

sell them both and use the money to explore other vintage mac's you've always wanted to play with :)
#I Can Re-Cap Your Board/PSU# (iAmCapsMack@gmail.com) or (maccaps.com) Link---->
Need: 840av, IIfx, *Portable Mainboard, Portable Parts pm-me please*
Fav's: SE/30-FIXD, LC575 Full 040@33mhz /w 1G-HD, IIsi-oc'd-29-mhz, PM 6100-oc'd 90mhz, Color Classic /wLC520 mobo
User avatar
uniserver
 
Joined: 12 Dec 2011, 18:51
Location: Southfield, Mi

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby mcdermd » 27 Apr 2012, 04:25

If you keep the Pismo, get a PCMCIA Adaptec SCSI card.

If you keep the Lombard, get a PCMCIA Lucent WaveLAN card.

I'd keep the Pismo, personally (disclaimer: I have a Pismo and a couple of Wallstreets).
Classic: Too many to list. See http://www.applefool.com for details.
Modern: 21.5" iMac 3.06GHz Core i3, 15" MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz C2D, 13" MacBook 2.1GHz C2D, XServe Dual 2.0GHz G5
User avatar
mcdermd
 
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 06:21
Location: Corvallis, Oregon

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby jruschme » 27 Apr 2012, 10:41

Responding to a bunch of posts...

I do have a Lucent card, so wireless for the Lombard isn't an issue. (I could also pull the Airport out of my Sawtoth and put that in the Pismo.) PCMCIA SCSI for the Mac always seemed like a pricey affair, though I do have both the Adaptec and Xircom USB SCSI adapters already.

I do have to agree with jt and mcdermd on the OldWorld charm of a Wallstreet. I used to have a nice PDQ that I had rebuilt, but ended up giving to someone who desparately needed a laptop.

I think my desire to get rid of one of the laptops comes from a desire to minimize the number of "idle" computers that I have. One for Classic, I can justify, the other I can't.

Judging from the ranges of responses, I'm glad to know that I am not the only one who is conflicted on this issue. Oddly, one thing that is making me lean toward keeping the Pismo is FireWire TDM since I could use that transfer files from a newer Mac whereas the Lombard would probably be Zip 250 all the way.

Thanks for the thoughts; feel free to keep them coming in.
JR

13" MBP (late 2010), MDD G4/1000x2, Sawtooth G4/800, Pismo G3/500, Lombard G3/333, B&W G4/400
jruschme
 
Joined: 01 Sep 2009, 21:02
Location: Brick, NJ

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby Trash80toHP_Mini » 27 Apr 2012, 11:36

There's something about using a PDQ with a teardrop mouse that just feels right. That's the one I've loaded up with GraphicConverter & Illustrator 8 for light graphic, AppleWorks and Quicken as the fourth in my series of BookKeeping 'Books.

The Pismo is head and shoulders the "better machine" and I even have a BookEndz Dock for it, but Illustrator 9 is the only 9+X Application I own, but AI8 screams already under OS9 and the PDQ/OS9 just fits.

Funny you mention ZIPs, my NIB ZIP for the Pismo arrived yesterday. I've got ZIP100s from the IIfx up through the NetBooks . . . just need one for the 1400s . . .
. . . for almost two years I've been network free. Now I'm setting one up just to test some NICs. :lol:
jt [8]
Trash Hauler: call sign: eight-ball

C.O. AC130H SpecOps 68kMLAAF
User avatar
Trash80toHP_Mini
NIGHT STALKER
 
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 02:23
Location: Bermuda Triangle, NC, USA

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby jruschme » 27 Apr 2012, 13:17

my NIB ZIP for the Pismo arrived yesterday. I've got ZIP100s from the IIfx up through the NetBooks


Same here... I've got enough disks to last the apocalypse and have installed internal drives in any system that would take one. (Except the MDD as the Zip faceplate is pure unobtainium, so that one has a Firewire Zip250.) I even have a Zip750 and a SuperDisk drive on the system at work; the latter serving mostly as a USB floppy drive.

BTW, in case you didn't know... the mechanism in the Pismo expansion bay Zip is common across expansion bay disks and electrically and physically compatible between Zip100 and Zip250. I actually "upgraded" mine from a Zip100 to a Zip250 by using the actual drive mechanism from a Dell C-series Zip250.
JR

13" MBP (late 2010), MDD G4/1000x2, Sawtooth G4/800, Pismo G3/500, Lombard G3/333, B&W G4/400
jruschme
 
Joined: 01 Sep 2009, 21:02
Location: Brick, NJ

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby Trash80toHP_Mini » 27 Apr 2012, 14:12

8-) Thanks for that TidBit, JR, I've now got a couple of SCSI Zip100s from back in the day, a FW Zip 250 (many thanks tmtomh) a USB Zip250, 3 USB Zip100s, PB5300, PDQ & Pismo.

SneakerNet.Zip is just awesome . . . I friggin' loathe setting up networks, I'm walking away from total failure of a setup session ATM!!! ARRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! >:(<

Time to build some more freakin' cables! ::)
jt [8]
Trash Hauler: call sign: eight-ball

C.O. AC130H SpecOps 68kMLAAF
User avatar
Trash80toHP_Mini
NIGHT STALKER
 
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 02:23
Location: Bermuda Triangle, NC, USA

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby Bunsen » 29 Apr 2012, 12:42

Is it practicality or passion that is driving your choices here? Do you have older Macs as well, such that a bridge machine between Old and New World would be useful? If so, I would suggest selling them both, and getting a fast Wallstreet PDQ with a floppy drive, max it out with RAM, and add a Firewire/USB Cardbus card, and a WiFi card. The new 12" Powerbook G4 sounds perfect for light couch surfing, and the Wallstreet can sit quietly in the background, connected up to all manner of drives and networks.

On the other hand, if it's a matter of passion - keep them both ... and get a Wallstreet as well ;)

If it was a question of keeping just one, I would personally trade the Lombard in on a good Wallstreet, and keep the Pismo as the sine qua non of old-school Powerbooks.
have you searched? Seeks: Nubus PDS DSP PB170 Newton; TRS-80 III/4; CBM BBC SX-64 CX5M Likes: 8bit luggable palmtop terminal NC tablet audio MIDI analog FM drum synth steam&dieselpunk; 1930-1980 lab/comm/mil Score! NC100 PB190 Q950 IIe-PDS
User avatar
Bunsen
Witchfinder-General
 
Joined: 02 May 2007, 15:59
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Which to keep? Pismo or Lombard

Postby Arthegall » 06 May 2012, 13:21

Bunsen is absolutely right. A Wallstreet PDQ is the perfect machine for vintage Mac enthusiasts. It's the last machine Apple made that can read/write the old 800k floppies (since it was the last Old-world machine), and the floppy modules can be had for $20 to $30 on eBay if your current one dies. No fuss. No mess. Just swamp them out.

Get yourself a third-party USB card, format yourself a transport thumb drive using the Wallstreet and 9.2.2, and you can use your Wallstreet as an extremely simply and efficient bridge between your modern, Internet-capable Mac and your 1980s compact Macs.

If it were me, I'd trade both the Lombard and the Pismo for a Wallstreet and the necessary accessories.
Software preservation is paramount.
Emulation is the ultimate form of Mac liberation.
Running: Mac Plus --> Wallstreet G3 w/ USB card and floppy drive --> Sandy Bridge Mac Mini via thumb drive
User avatar
Arthegall
 
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 10:43
Location: Greer, SC


Return to PPC PowerBook & iBook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cameront9 and 0 guests